SPECS / COMPARISON
Bobcat E50 vs Volvo EC55B
A detailed comparison of the Bobcat E50 and the Volvo EC55B. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Bobcat E5037 kW (49 HP)
Volvo EC55B37 kW (50 HP)
Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
Volvo EC55B5200 kg (11464 lbs)
Operating Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
Volvo EC55B5200 kg (11464 lbs)
| Specification | Bobcat E50 Mini Excavators | Volvo EC55B Mini Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mini Excavator | Mini Excavator |
| Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 5200 kg (11464 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 37 kW (49 HP) | 37 kW (50 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 402 cm (158 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 402 cm (158 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 594.4 cm (234.0 in.) | 600.5 cm (236.4 in.) |
| Emission | Tier 4 | — |
| Net Power | 37 kW (49 HP) | 37 kW (50 HP) |
| Gross Power | 38.9 kW (52.1 HP) | 39 kw (52 hp) |
| Rated Power | 2200 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Operating Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 5200 kg (11464 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 5.0 km (3.1 mph) | 4.3 km (2.7 mph) |
| Min Travel Speed | 3.1 km (1.9 mph) | — |
| Cab Height | 256.0 cm (100.8 in.) | 256.0 cm (100.8 in.) |
| Fuel Capacity | 79.9 l (21.1 gal) | 90.1 l (23.8 gal) |
| Engine Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Boom Swing(Left) | 75 ° | — |
| Boom Swing(Right) | 50 ° | — |
| Arm Digging Force | 3.059 kg (6744 lbs) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 387.1 cm (152.4 in.) | 579.1 cm (228.0 in.) |
| Max Lift Capacity | 2.737 kg (6034 lbs) | — |
| Max Loading Height | — | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | — | 262.1 cm (103.2 in.) |
| Overall Length | — | 591.3 cm (232.8 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 0.3 m2 (0.4 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | — | 0.1 m2 (0.1 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | — | 39.6 cm (15.6 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | — | 167.6 cm (66.0 in.) |
| Overall Width | — | 192.0 cm (75.6 in.) |
| Engine Make | — | Volvo |
| Engine Model | — | 4 TNV94L-XVC1 |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 102 LPM (27.8 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | — | 10.2 l (2.7 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 210 Bar (3046 psi) |
| Swing Speed | — | 10 RPM |
| Aspiration | — | Naturally |
| Max Torque | — | 201.1 Nm (148.3 ft-lbs) |
| Cooling Capacity | — | 12.1 l (3.2 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | — | 90.1 l (23.8 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | — | Operating Voltage 12 V |
| Ground Pressure | — | 32.4 kPa (4.7 psi) |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | — | 1 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | — | 5 |
| Displacement | — | 3051.3 cc (186 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | — | 40.1 cm (15.8 in.) |
| No of Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Alternator | — | 55 A |
| Track Gauge | — | 152.4 cm (60.0 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 70.1 cm (27.6 in.) |
| Torque Power | — | 1400 RPM |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Kubota U55-4GA1 Vs Volvo EC55B ↗
- Volvo EC55 Vs Volvo EC55B ↗
- Volvo ECR58 Vs Volvo EC55B ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Hyundai HE50A ↗
- Volvo EC55B Vs Kubota KX161-3 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Vermeer CX254 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8045 ZTS ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8052 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Kubota KX161-3 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Volvo EC55 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Terex HR18 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗

