SPECS / COMPARISON
Bobcat E50 vs Volvo EC55
A detailed comparison of the Bobcat E50 and the Volvo EC55. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Bobcat E5037 kW (49 HP)
Volvo EC5538 kW (51 HP)
Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
Volvo EC554910 kg (10825 lbs)
Operating Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
Volvo EC554910 kg (10825 lbs)
| Specification | Bobcat E50 Mini Excavators | Volvo EC55 Mini Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mini Excavator | Mini Excavator |
| Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 4910 kg (10825 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 37 kW (49 HP) | 38 kW (51 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 402 cm (158 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 402 cm (158 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 594.4 cm (234.0 in.) | 600.5 cm (236.4 in.) |
| Emission | Tier 4 | — |
| Net Power | 37 kW (49 HP) | 38 kW (51 HP) |
| Gross Power | 38.9 kW (52.1 HP) | 40 kw (53.7 hp) |
| Rated Power | 2200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Operating Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 4910 kg (10825 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 5.0 km (3.1 mph) | 4.3 km (2.7 mph) |
| Min Travel Speed | 3.1 km (1.9 mph) | — |
| Cab Height | 256.0 cm (100.8 in.) | 256.0 cm (100.8 in.) |
| Fuel Capacity | 79.9 l (21.1 gal) | 90.1 l (23.8 gal) |
| Engine Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Boom Swing(Left) | 75 ° | — |
| Boom Swing(Right) | 50 ° | — |
| Arm Digging Force | 3.059 kg (6744 lbs) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 387.1 cm (152.4 in.) | 579.1 cm (228.0 in.) |
| Max Lift Capacity | 2.737 kg (6034 lbs) | — |
| Max Loading Height | — | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | — | 262.1 cm (103.2 in.) |
| Overall Length | — | 591.3 cm (232.8 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 0.3 m2 (0.4 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | — | 0.1 m2 (0.1 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | — | 39.6 cm (15.6 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | — | 167.6 cm (66.0 in.) |
| Overall Width | — | 192.0 cm (75.6 in.) |
| Engine Make | — | Volvo |
| Engine Model | — | 4 TNE94-SM |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 110 LPM (29.1 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | — | 9.8 l (2.6 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 210 Bar (3046 psi) |
| Swing Speed | — | 10 RPM |
| Aspiration | — | Naturally |
| Max Torque | — | 181.0 Nm (133.5 ft-lbs) |
| Cooling Capacity | — | 12.1 l (3.2 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | — | 90.1 l (23.8 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | — | Operating Voltage 12 V |
| Ground Pressure | — | 29.0 kPa (4.2 psi) |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | — | 1 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | — | 5 |
| Displacement | — | 2800.5 cc (171 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | — | 40.1 cm (15.8 in.) |
| No of Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Alternator | — | 40 A |
| Track Gauge | — | 152.4 cm (60.0 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 70.1 cm (27.6 in.) |
| Torque Power | — | 1600 RPM |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Volvo EC55 Vs Volvo EC55B ↗
- Volvo EC55 Vs Terex HR18 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Hyundai HE50A ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Vermeer CX254 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8045 ZTS ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Volvo EC55B ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8052 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Kubota KX161-3 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Terex HR18 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Volvo EC50 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Bobcat 435 ↗

