SPECS / COMPARISON
Bobcat E50 vs Volvo EC50
A detailed comparison of the Bobcat E50 and the Volvo EC50. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Bobcat E5037 kW (49 HP)
Volvo EC5034 kW (45 HP)
Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
Volvo EC504833 kg (10655 lbs)
Operating Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
Volvo EC504833 kg (10655 lbs)
| Specification | Bobcat E50 Mini Excavators | Volvo EC50 Mini Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mini Excavator | Mini Excavator |
| Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 4833 kg (10655 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 37 kW (49 HP) | 34 kW (45 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 372 cm (146 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 372 cm (146 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 594.4 cm (234.0 in.) | 560.8 cm (220.8 in.) |
| Emission | Tier 4 | — |
| Net Power | 37 kW (49 HP) | 34 kW (45 HP) |
| Gross Power | 38.9 kW (52.1 HP) | 35.9 kW (48.1 HP) |
| Rated Power | 2200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Operating Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 4833 kg (10655 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 5.0 km (3.1 mph) | 5.1 km (3.2 mph) |
| Min Travel Speed | 3.1 km (1.9 mph) | — |
| Cab Height | 256.0 cm (100.8 in.) | 253.0 cm (99.6 in.) |
| Fuel Capacity | 79.9 l (21.1 gal) | 80.3 l (21.2 gal) |
| Engine Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Boom Swing(Left) | 75 ° | — |
| Boom Swing(Right) | 50 ° | — |
| Arm Digging Force | 3.059 kg (6744 lbs) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 387.1 cm (152.4 in.) | 506.0 cm (199.2 in.) |
| Max Lift Capacity | 2.737 kg (6034 lbs) | — |
| Max Loading Height | — | 359.7 cm (141.6 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | — | 292.6 cm (115.2 in.) |
| Overall Length | — | 518.2 cm (204.0 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 0.3 m2 (0.4 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | — | 0.1 m2 (0.1 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | — | 39.6 cm (15.6 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | — | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) |
| Overall Width | — | 185.9 cm (73.2 in.) |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 102 LPM (27.1 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | — | 70.0 l (18.5 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 250 Bar (3626 psi) |
| Swing Speed | — | 10 RPM |
| Max Torque | — | 139.1 Nm (102.6 ft-lbs) |
| Cooling Capacity | — | 8.3 l (2.2 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | — | 8.3 l (2.2 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | — | Operating Voltage 12 V |
| Ground Pressure | — | 32.4 kPa (4.7 psi) |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | — | 4 |
| Displacement | — | 2217.2 cc (135 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | — | 40.1 cm (15.8 in.) |
| No of Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Alternator | — | 55 A |
| Track Gauge | — | 146.3 cm (57.6 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 70.1 cm (27.6 in.) |
| Torque Power | — | 2050 RPM |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Volvo EC50 Vs Case CX50B ZTS ↗
- Volvo EC50 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- JCB 8045 ZTS Vs Volvo EC50 ↗
- Volvo EC50 Vs Cat 304C CR ↗
- Volvo EC50 Vs Cat 305 CR ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Hyundai HE50A ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Vermeer CX254 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8045 ZTS ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Volvo EC55B ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8052 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Kubota KX161-3 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Volvo EC55 ↗

