SPECS / COMPARISON
Volvo EC50 vs New Holland E50.2SR
A detailed comparison of the Volvo EC50 and the New Holland E50.2SR. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Volvo EC5034 kW (45 HP)
New Holland E50.2SR32 kW (43 HP)
Weight
Volvo EC504833 kg (10655 lbs)
New Holland E50.2SR4870 kg (10737 lbs)
Operating Weight
Volvo EC504833 kg (10655 lbs)
New Holland E50.2SR4870 kg (10737 lbs)
| Specification | Volvo EC50 Mini Excavators | New Holland E50.2SR Mini Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mini Excavator | Mini Excavator |
| Weight | 4833 kg (10655 lbs) | 4870 kg (10737 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 34 kW (45 HP) | 32 kW (43 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 372 cm (146 in.) | 360 cm (142 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 372 cm (146 in.) | 360 cm (142 in.) |
| Max Loading Height | 359.7 cm (141.6 in.) | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 560.8 cm (220.8 in.) | 576.1 cm (226.8 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | 292.6 cm (115.2 in.) | 283.5 cm (111.6 in.) |
| Overall Length | 518.2 cm (204.0 in.) | 524.3 cm (206.4 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | 0.3 m2 (0.4 cu yds) | 0.2 m2 (0.3 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | 0.1 m2 (0.1 cu yds) | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | 39.6 cm (15.6 in.) | — |
| Tail Swing Radius | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) | 100.6 cm (39.6 in.) |
| Overall Width | 185.9 cm (73.2 in.) | 198.1 cm (78.0 in.) |
| Net Power | 34 kW (45 HP) | 32 kW (43 HP) |
| Gross Power | 35.9 kW (48.1 HP) | 34.4 kW (46.1 HP) |
| Rated Power | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | 102 LPM (27.1 GPM) | 114 LPM (30.2 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 70.0 l (18.5 gal) | 63.2 l (16.7 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | 250 Bar (3626 psi) | 230 Bar (3336 psi) |
| Operating Weight | 4833 kg (10655 lbs) | 4870 kg (10737 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 5.1 km (3.2 mph) | 4.7 km (2.9 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 10 RPM | 8.8 RPM |
| Cab Height | 253.0 cm (99.6 in.) | 262.1 cm (103.2 in.) |
| Max Torque | 139.1 Nm (102.6 ft-lbs) | — |
| Cooling Capacity | 8.3 l (2.2 gal) | 6.1 l (1.6 gal) |
| Fuel Capacity | 80.3 l (21.2 gal) | 53.4 l (14.1 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 8.3 l (2.2 gal) | 7.6 l (2.0 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | Operating Voltage 12 V | Operating Voltage 12 V |
| Ground Pressure | 32.4 kPa (4.7 psi) | 27.6 kPa (4.0 psi) |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 2217.2 cc (135 cu. in.) | 2191.0 cc (134 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 40.1 cm (15.8 in.) | 40.1 cm (15.8 in.) |
| No of Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Max Cutting Height | 506.0 cm (199.2 in.) | 570.0 cm (224.4 in.) |
| Alternator | 55 A | 55 A |
| Track Gauge | 146.3 cm (57.6 in.) | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | 70.1 cm (27.6 in.) | 64.0 cm (25.2 in.) |
| Torque Power | 2050 RPM | — |
| Engine Make | — | Yanmar |
| Engine Model | — | 4 TNV88-XYB |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Volvo EC50 Vs Case CX50B ZTS ↗
- JCB 8045 ZTS Vs Volvo EC50 ↗
- New Holland E50.2SR Vs Case CX40B ↗
- Cat 304C CR Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- Thomas 45 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- Volvo EC50 Vs Cat 304C CR ↗
- JCB 8052 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- Volvo EC50 Vs Cat 305 CR ↗
- New Holland E50.2SR Vs IHI 45NX ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Volvo EC50 ↗