SPECS / COMPARISON
Bobcat E50 vs New Holland E50.2SR
A detailed comparison of the Bobcat E50 and the New Holland E50.2SR. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Bobcat E5037 kW (49 HP)
New Holland E50.2SR32 kW (43 HP)
Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
New Holland E50.2SR4870 kg (10737 lbs)
Operating Weight
Bobcat E504843 kg (10677 lbs)
New Holland E50.2SR4870 kg (10737 lbs)
| Specification | Bobcat E50 Mini Excavators | New Holland E50.2SR Mini Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mini Excavator | Mini Excavator |
| Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 4870 kg (10737 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 37 kW (49 HP) | 32 kW (43 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 360 cm (142 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 354 cm (139 in.) | 360 cm (142 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 594.4 cm (234.0 in.) | 576.1 cm (226.8 in.) |
| Emission | Tier 4 | — |
| Net Power | 37 kW (49 HP) | 32 kW (43 HP) |
| Gross Power | 38.9 kW (52.1 HP) | 34.4 kW (46.1 HP) |
| Rated Power | 2200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Operating Weight | 4843 kg (10677 lbs) | 4870 kg (10737 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 5.0 km (3.1 mph) | 4.7 km (2.9 mph) |
| Min Travel Speed | 3.1 km (1.9 mph) | — |
| Cab Height | 256.0 cm (100.8 in.) | 262.1 cm (103.2 in.) |
| Fuel Capacity | 79.9 l (21.1 gal) | 53.4 l (14.1 gal) |
| Engine Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Boom Swing(Left) | 75 ° | — |
| Boom Swing(Right) | 50 ° | — |
| Arm Digging Force | 3.059 kg (6744 lbs) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 387.1 cm (152.4 in.) | 570.0 cm (224.4 in.) |
| Max Lift Capacity | 2.737 kg (6034 lbs) | — |
| Max Loading Height | — | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | — | 283.5 cm (111.6 in.) |
| Overall Length | — | 524.3 cm (206.4 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 0.2 m2 (0.3 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | — | 0.2 m2 (0.2 cu yds) |
| Tail Swing Radius | — | 100.6 cm (39.6 in.) |
| Overall Width | — | 198.1 cm (78.0 in.) |
| Engine Make | — | Yanmar |
| Engine Model | — | 4 TNV88-XYB |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 114 LPM (30.2 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | — | 63.2 l (16.7 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 230 Bar (3336 psi) |
| Swing Speed | — | 8.8 RPM |
| Cooling Capacity | — | 6.1 l (1.6 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | — | 7.6 l (2.0 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | — | Operating Voltage 12 V |
| Ground Pressure | — | 27.6 kPa (4.0 psi) |
| Displacement | — | 2191.0 cc (134 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | — | 40.1 cm (15.8 in.) |
| No of Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Alternator | — | 55 A |
| Track Gauge | — | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 64.0 cm (25.2 in.) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Volvo EC50 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- New Holland E50.2SR Vs Case CX40B ↗
- Cat 304C CR Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- Thomas 45 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- JCB 8052 Vs New Holland E50.2SR ↗
- New Holland E50.2SR Vs IHI 45NX ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Hyundai HE50A ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Vermeer CX254 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8045 ZTS ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Volvo EC55B ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs JCB 8052 ↗
- Bobcat E50 Vs Kubota KX161-3 ↗