SPECS / COMPARISON
Compare models
Manufacturer-sourced values side by side. No performance equivalence or ranking is applied across different machine classes.
| Feature | Volvo L50CDozer | Case 850H LTDozer |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Wheel Loader | Crawler Dozer |
| Horsepower | 72.3 kW | 72.3 kW |
| Weight | 8999.3 kg | — |
| Tipping Capacity | 5479.4 kg | — |
| Max Speed | 39.1 km/h | — |
| Engine Model | TD 40 KAE | 6 T-590 |
| No Of Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | — |
| Displacement | 4000.1 cc | 5883.0 cc |
| Alternator Supplied Amperage | 60 amps | — |
| Operating Voltage | 24 V | — |
| Rated Speed | 2200 RPM | — |
| Torque Speed | 1400 RPM | — |
| Net Power | 72.3 kW | 67.9 kW |
| Gross Power | 75.3 kW | 72.3 kW |
| Peak Torque | 390.1 N-m | — |
| Fuel Capacity | 170.3 l | 177.9 l |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 11.4 l | 15.5 l |
| Cooling Capacity | 22.3 l | — |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 65.1 l | — |
| Transmission Oil Capacity | 7.2 l | — |
| Differential Front Capacity | 22.3 l | — |
| Differential Rear Capacity | 22.3 l | — |
| Transmission Type | Hydrostatic | Case constant-mesh |
| No of Forward Gears | 2 | — |
| No of Reverse Gears | 2 | — |
| Rear Axle Oscillation | 24 ° | — |
| Max Speed (Forward) | 39.1 km/h | — |
| Max Speed (Reverse) | 39.1 km/h | — |
| Pump type | Axial Piston Pump | — |
| Pump Flow | 120.4 LPM | 90.5 LPM |
| Relief Pressure | 260.0 bar | — |
| Raise Lift Arms | 5.4 sec | — |
| Lower Lift Time | 3 sec | — |
| Bucket Dump Time | 1.1 sec | — |
| Operating Weight | 8999.3 kg | 7946.5 kg |
| Tipping Load | 5479.4 kg | — |
| Bucket Capacity (Heaped) | 1.5 m³ | — |
| Bucket Width | 243.8 cm | — |
| Breakout Force | _ - | — |
| Reach At Max Lift And Dump | 91.4 cm | — |
| Dump Clearance At Max Raise | 274.3 cm | — |
| Turning Radius | 548.6 cm | — |
| Wheelbase | 274.3 cm | — |
| Bucket Hinge Pin | 365.8 cm | — |
| Cab Height | 304.8 cm | 289.6 cm |
| Overall Length | 640.1 cm | — |
| Ground Clearance | 30.5 cm | 42.7 cm |
| Width Over Tires | 213.4 cm | — |
| Tire Size | 15.5 R25 | — |
| Engine Manufacturer | — | Case |
| Number of Cylinders | — | 6 |
| Max Torque | — | 387.8 N-m |
| Power Measured RPM | — | 2200 RPM |
| Torque Measured RPM | — | 1200 RPM |
| Alternator Supplied Amp. | — | 65 A |
| Alternator | — | 65 A |
| Battery | — | 12 V |
| Number of Forward Gears | — | 4 |
| Number of Reverse Gears | — | 4 |
| Max Speed Forward | — | 9.0 km/h |
| Max Speed Reverse | — | 10.0 km/h |
| Ground Pressure | — | 0.4 bar |
| Cooling System Capacity | — | 18.9 l |
| Hydraulic Capacity | — | 52.6 l |
| Final Drives Capacity | — | 7.2 l |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow | — | 90.5 LPM |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 151.7 bar |
| Width Over Track | — | 198.1 cm |
| Length Overall | — | 429.8 cm |
| Length of Track on Ground | — | 225.6 cm |
| Track Gauge | — | 152.4 cm |
| Ground Contact Area | — | 51734.1 cm³ |
| No of Carrier Rollers Per Side | — | 1 |
| No of Shoes Per Side | — | 38 |
| No of Track Rollers Per Side | — | 6 |
| Shoe Size | — | 45.7 cm |
| Weight (Operating) | — | 7946.5 kg |
| Track Pitch | — | 17.3 cm |
| Source | heavyequipments.net archive (imported 2026-10) | heavyequipments.net archive (imported 2026-10) |
POPULAR COMPARISONS
MODEL COMPARISONS
Side-by-side specification comparisons generated from the manufacturer-sourced model files. · 7,051
- Komatsu D41P-6C Vs HBXG TY120A
- Caterpillar D10N Vs Komatsu D275AX-5
- JCB Fastrac 185 Vs Allis Chalmers 7045
- Kobelco ED160-3 BLADE RUNNER Vs Komatsu PC138US-10
- John Deere 410E Vs John Deere 315SG
- Hitachi ZX500LC-3 Vs Hitachi ZAXIS470LCH
- Kubota R520S Vs Venieri VF1.33
- Simplicity Legacy XL 27D Vs Wheel Horse D-180
- Kubota B6100 Vs Kubota B7100
- Cub Cadet GT2550 Vs Craftsman CTX9000
- Allis Chalmers 160 Vs Massey Ferguson 250
- Komatsu PC160-6 Vs Case CX160
- Wheel Horse C-125 Vs Cub Cadet 1250
- New Holland W80BTC Vs Mecalac AS700
- Cat 442D Vs Case 680L
- Hitachi EX60WD-2 Vs Mecalac 7MWR
- Volvo EL70 Vs New Holland B110C
- Kubota MX5000 Vs John Deere 1650
- Ford 1320 Vs Yanmar YM2210
- Mustang ME3703 Vs Komatsu PC35MR-2
- Volvo ECR88 Vs Hitachi ZX85USB-5
- Cub Cadet 108 Vs Bolens 1050
- Cat 924Gz Vs Komatsu WA250-3
- Kato HD823MR Vs Volvo EC210B LC
- Massey Ferguson 231 Vs John Deere 920
- Bobcat S740 Vs Case Sv280
- John Deere 444J Vs John Deere 524K II
- Bobcat S570 Vs John Deere 318G
- New Holland E215 Vs Case CX210D
- John Deere 8320 Vs John Deere 8410
- Caterpillar D6R XL Vs Caterpillar D6T LGP WH
- Cat E70B Vs Link-Belt 1600 QUANTUM
- Case 521G Vs John Deere 544GH
- Massey Ferguson 245 Vs John Deere A
- Allis Chalmers WD Vs Farmall 230
- Massey Ferguson 573 Vs New Holland TN75
- New Holland D75 WT Vs Komatsu D39PX22
- Junlian JL853 Vs Daewoo MEGA 300 III
- Komatsu HB215LC-2 Vs JCB JS210LC
- Ford 1715 Vs Kubota B2410
- Caterpillar D6D LGP Vs New Holland D150 XLT
- International Harvester 404 Vs Ford Dexta
- Komatsu D61EX-15 Vs Komatsu D61PX-15 EO
- Case 9050B Vs Hyundai ROBEX 320NLC-7A
- Sumitomo SH450HD-3 Vs Liebherr R960 DEMOLITION LITRONIC
- Kubota L355 Vs Mahindra 2538
- Hitachi ZX470R-3 Vs Volvo EC480D
- John Deere 3203 Vs Kubota L3010
- Case Tr340 Vs Case Tr320
- John Deere 444E Loader with Coupler Vs Terex SKL160
- Cat 930K Vs John Deere 544K
- Komatsu WB70A-1 Vs JCB 2CX Streetmaster
- Cat 416F2 Vs Cat 432E
- Cat 301.6C Vs Terex TC16
- Ford 7700 Vs Massey Ferguson 1080
- Bobcat S750 Vs Bobcat A770
- Sumitomo SH200LC Vs Sumitomo SH200
- Wacker Neuson EW100 Vs YTO WY10B
- Hitachi EX700 Vs Case CX700
- Simplicity Regent 4211 Vs Cub Cadet 1100