Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 1864 vs Cub Cadet 1810

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 1864 and the Cub Cadet 1810. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 186413.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Cub Cadet 181013.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weight
Cub Cadet 1864399.0 kg (879.6 lbs)
Cub Cadet 1810kg
SpecificationCub Cadet 1864Cub Cadet 1864Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 1810Cub Cadet 1810Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower13.4 kW (18.0 HP)13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weight399.0 kg (879.6 lbs)kg
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length182.0 cm (71.7 in.)182.0 cm (71.7 in.)
Years Made1993-19971986-1989
Engine ModelKohler CommandKohler M18
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V4-stroke, air-cooled, V
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement624 cc (38.1 cu in.)691 cc (42.2 cu in.)
Bore7.70 cm (3.03 in.)7.90 cm (3.11 in.)
Stroke6.71 cm (2.64 in.)7.01 cm (2.76 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with electric clutch
Battery12 V, CCA 440A12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Height111.0 cm (43.7 in.)109.0 cm (42.9 in.)
Wheelbase115.0 cm (45.3 in.)111.0 cm (43.7 in.)
Ground Clearance15.0 cm (5.9 in.)15.0 cm (5.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity18.9 l (5.0 gal)15.1 l (4.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.9 l (0.5 gal)1.9 l (0.5 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity6.6 l (1.7 gal)6.6 l (1.7 gal)
Engine Oil TypeSAE 10W-30—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)
BrakesDual discDry disc
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypePowerManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 16×6.50-8Lawn/turf: 16×6.50-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 23×10.50-12Lawn/turf: 23×10.50-12
Drawbar Category—0

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons