Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 1810 vs Cub Cadet 1862

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 1810 and the Cub Cadet 1862. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 181013.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Cub Cadet 186213.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weight
Cub Cadet 1810kg
Cub Cadet 1862405.0 kg (892.9 lbs)
SpecificationCub Cadet 1810Cub Cadet 1810Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 1862Cub Cadet 1862Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower13.4 kW (18.0 HP)13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weightkg405.0 kg (892.9 lbs)
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length182.0 cm (71.7 in.)182.0 cm (71.7 in.)
Years Made1986-19891990-1992
Engine ModelKohler M18Kohler Magnum M18
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement691 cc (42.2 cu in.)691 cc (42.2 cu in.)
Bore7.90 cm (3.11 in.)7.90 cm (3.11 in.)
Stroke7.01 cm (2.76 in.)7.01 cm (2.76 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with electric clutch
Battery12 V12 V, CCA 440A
StarterElectricElectric
Height109.0 cm (42.9 in.)111.0 cm (43.7 in.)
Wheelbase111.0 cm (43.7 in.)118.0 cm (46.5 in.)
Ground Clearance15.0 cm (5.9 in.)15.0 cm (5.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity15.1 l (4.0 gal)18.9 l (5.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.9 l (0.5 gal)1.7 l (0.4 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity6.6 l (1.7 gal)—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)
BrakesDry discDual disc
Drawbar Category00
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManualPower
Front TiresLawn/turf: 16×6.50-8Lawn/turf: 16×6.50-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 23×10.50-12Lawn/turf: 23×10.50-12
Engine Oil Type—SAE 10W-30, 10W-40

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons