Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 1872 vs Cub Cadet 1862

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 1872 and the Cub Cadet 1862. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 187213.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Cub Cadet 186213.4 kW (18.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 1872Cub Cadet 1872Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 1862Cub Cadet 1862Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower13.4 kW (18.0 HP)13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length199.0 cm (78.3 in.)182.0 cm (71.7 in.)
Years Made1987-19891990-1992
Engine ModelKohler MagnumKohler Magnum M18
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement691 cc (42.2 cu in.)691 cc (42.2 cu in.)
Bore7.90 cm (3.11 in.)7.90 cm (3.11 in.)
Stroke7.01 cm (2.76 in.)7.01 cm (2.76 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with electric clutch
Spark PlugChamption RBL-15Y—
Battery12 V12 V, CCA 440A
StarterElectricElectric
Height12.0 cm (4.7 in.)111.0 cm (43.7 in.)
Wheelbase131.0 cm (51.6 in.)118.0 cm (46.5 in.)
Ground Clearance19.0 cm (7.5 in.)15.0 cm (5.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity15.1 l (4.0 gal)18.9 l (5.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.8 l (0.5 gal)1.7 l (0.4 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity6.6 l (1.7 gal)—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)
BrakesDual discDual disc
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypePowerPower
Front TiresLawn/turf: 18×8.50-8Lawn/turf: 16×6.50-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 26×12.00-12Lawn/turf: 23×10.50-12
Weight—405.0 kg (892.9 lbs)
Engine Oil Type—SAE 10W-30, 10W-40
Drawbar Category—0

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons