Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 1810 vs Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 KW

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 1810 and the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 KW. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 181013.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 KW13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 1810Cub Cadet 1810Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet XT2 LX42 KWCub Cadet XT2 LX42 KWGarden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower13.4 kW (18.0 HP)13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weightkg—
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticBelt-driven hydrostatic
Length182.0 cm (71.7 in.)172.0 cm (67.7 in.)
Years Made1986-19892015-
Engine ModelKohler M18Kawasaki FR600V
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement691 cc (42.2 cu in.)603 cc (36.8 cu in.)
Bore7.90 cm (3.11 in.)7.29 cm (2.87 in.)
Stroke7.01 cm (2.76 in.)7.19 cm (2.83 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with manual clutch
Battery12 V12 V, CCA 300A
StarterElectricElectric
Height109.0 cm (42.9 in.)107.0 cm (42.1 in.)
Wheelbase111.0 cm (43.7 in.)119.0 cm (46.9 in.)
Ground Clearance15.0 cm (5.9 in.)—
Fuel Tank Capacity15.1 l (4.0 gal)11.5 l (3.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.9 l (0.5 gal)1.8 l (0.5 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity6.6 l (1.7 gal)—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)—
BrakesDry discDisc
Drawbar Category0—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManualManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 16×6.50-8Lawn/turf: 15x6x6
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 23×10.50-12Lawn/turf: 20x8x8
Spark Plug—NGK BPR4ES
Engine Oil Type—API: SJ or higher, SAE 10W-30
Transmission Model—Tuff Torq K46

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons