Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet LT2180 vs Cub Cadet 1864

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet LT2180 and the Cub Cadet 1864. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet LT218013.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Cub Cadet 186413.4 kW (18.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet LT2180Cub Cadet LT2180Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 1864Cub Cadet 1864Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower13.4 kW (18.0 HP)13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length182.0 cm (71.7 in.)182.0 cm (71.7 in.)
Years Made20041993-1997
Engine ModelBriggs & Stratton VanguardKohler Command
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled4-stroke, air-cooled, V
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement568 cc (34.7 cu in.)624 cc (38.1 cu in.)
Bore7.19 cm (2.83 in.)7.70 cm (3.03 in.)
Stroke7.01 cm (2.76 in.)6.71 cm (2.64 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with electric clutch
Rated RPM3600 RPM—
Battery12 V12 V, CCA 440A
StarterElectricElectric
Height106.0 cm (41.7 in.)111.0 cm (43.7 in.)
Wheelbase119.0 cm (46.9 in.)115.0 cm (45.3 in.)
Ground Clearance15.0 cm (5.9 in.)15.0 cm (5.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity7.9 l (2.1 gal)18.9 l (5.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.4 l (0.4 gal)1.9 l (0.5 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity5.7 l (1.5 gal)6.6 l (1.7 gal)
Engine Oil TypeSAE 5W-20, 10W-30SAE 10W-30
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed4.8 km/h (Forward: 6.0 MPH (9.7 km/h) Reverse: 3.0 MPH)6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)
BrakesInternal expandingDual disc
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManualPower
Front TiresLawn/turf: 15×6-6Lawn/turf: 16×6.50-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 20×9-8Lawn/turf: 23×10.50-12
Weight—399.0 kg (879.6 lbs)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons