Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

New Holland LB85 vs John Deere 315SG

A detailed comparison of the New Holland LB85 and the John Deere 315SG. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
New Holland LB8563.0 kW (84.5 HP)
John Deere 315SG63.0 kW (84.5 HP)
Lift Capacity
New Holland LB853551.6 kg (7830 lbs)
John Deere 315SG3265.9 kg (7200 lbs)
SpecificationNew Holland LB85New Holland LB85Backhoe LoadersJohn Deere 315SGJohn Deere 315SGBackhoe Loaders
Horsepower63.0 kW (84.5 HP)63.0 kW (84.5 HP)
Weight7266.5 kg (16020 lbs)—
TransmissionPower shuttlePowershift
Pump Capacity151.0 LPM (39.9 GPM)136.3 LPM (36 GPM)
Lift Capacity3551.6 kg (7830 lbs)3265.9 kg (7200 lbs)
Engine ManufacturerCNHJohn Deere
Engine Model450 /NB4045 T
Gross Power63.0 kW (84.5 HP)63.0 kW (84.5 HP)
Engine TypeDieselDiesel
Hydraulic System Capacity128.3 l (33.9 gal)—
Transmission TypePower shuttlePowershift
No Of Forward Gears44
No Of Reverse Gears44
Max Speed (Forward)38.9 km/h (24.2 mph)33.2 km/h (20.6 mph)
Max Speed (Reverse)38.9 km/h (24.2 mph)33.2 km/h (20.6 mph)
Pump TypeGear pumpGear pump
Pump Flow Capacity151.0 LPM (39.9 GPM)136.3 LPM (36 GPM)
Relief Valve Pressure209.9 bar (3045 psi)250.0 bar (3626 psi)
Dig Depth457.2 cm (180 in)426.7 cm (168 in)
Bucket Dig Force5737.9 kg (12650 lbs)5434.0 kg (11980 lbs)
Loading Height365.8 cm (144 in)365.8 cm (144 in)
Dump Height365.8 cm (144 in)274.3 cm (108 in)
Lift Capacity At Full Height3551.6 kg (7830 lbs)3265.9 kg (7200 lbs)
Load At Max Lift Capacity2100.1 kg (4630 lbs)5166.4 kg (11390 lbs)
Operating Weight7266.5 kg (16020 lbs)—
Bucket Capacity1.0 m³ (1.31 cu yds)1.0 m³ (1.31 cu yds)
Bucket Width227.6 cm (89.6 in)233.9 cm (92.1 in)
Reach From Swivel548.6 cm (216 in)548.6 cm (216 in)
Overall Height396.2 cm (156 in)243.8 cm (96 in)
Overall Length579.1 cm (228 in)518.2 cm (204 in)
Overall Width243.8 cm (96 in)365.8 cm (144 in)
Aspiration—Turbocharged
Fuel Capacity—136.3 l (36 gal)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons