Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

New Holland LB85 vs Volvo BL60B

A detailed comparison of the New Holland LB85 and the Volvo BL60B. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
New Holland LB857266.5 kg (16020 lbs)
Volvo BL60B7071.5 kg (15590 lbs)
Operating Weight
New Holland LB857266.5 kg (16020 lbs)
Volvo BL60B7071.5 kg (15590 lbs)
SpecificationNew Holland LB85New Holland LB85Backhoe LoadersVolvo BL60BVolvo BL60BBackhoe Loaders
Horsepower63.0 kW (84.5 HP)—
Weight7266.5 kg (16020 lbs)7071.5 kg (15590 lbs)
TransmissionPower shuttle—
Pump Capacity151.0 LPM (39.9 GPM)—
Lift Capacity3551.6 kg (7830 lbs)—
Engine ManufacturerCNHVolvo
Engine Model450 /NBD3.8H
Gross Power63.0 kW (84.5 HP)—
Engine TypeDieselDiesel
Hydraulic System Capacity128.3 l (33.9 gal)48.1 l (12.7 gal)
Transmission TypePower shuttle—
No Of Forward Gears44
No Of Reverse Gears44
Max Speed (Forward)38.9 km/h (24.2 mph)—
Max Speed (Reverse)38.9 km/h (24.2 mph)—
Pump TypeGear pump—
Pump Flow Capacity151.0 LPM (39.9 GPM)—
Relief Valve Pressure209.9 bar (3045 psi)—
Dig Depth457.2 cm (180 in)—
Bucket Dig Force5737.9 kg (12650 lbs)—
Loading Height365.8 cm (144 in)—
Dump Height365.8 cm (144 in)—
Lift Capacity At Full Height3551.6 kg (7830 lbs)—
Load At Max Lift Capacity2100.1 kg (4630 lbs)—
Operating Weight7266.5 kg (16020 lbs)7071.5 kg (15590 lbs)
Bucket Capacity1.0 m³ (1.31 cu yds)0.2 m³ (0.25 cu yds)
Bucket Width227.6 cm (89.6 in)62.5 cm (24.6 in)
Reach From Swivel548.6 cm (216 in)—
Overall Height396.2 cm (156 in)365.8 cm (144 in)
Overall Length579.1 cm (228 in)731.5 cm (288 in)
Overall Width243.8 cm (96 in)243.8 cm (96 in)
No Of Cylinders—4
Bore—10.2 cm (4 in)
Stroke—12.2 cm (4.8 in)
Fuel Capacity—150.3 l (39.7 gal)
Oil Capacity—13.2 l (3.5 gal)
Cooling Capacity—1.9 l (0.5 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity—21.2 l (5.6 gal)
Height To Top Of Cab—304.8 cm (120 in)
Wheelbase—213.4 cm (84 in)
Ground Clearance—30.5 cm (12 in)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons