SPECS / COMPARISON
Komatsu PC150LGP-6 vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC
A detailed comparison of the Komatsu PC150LGP-6 and the Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Weight
Komatsu PC150LGP-615830 kg (34899 lbs)
Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC16500 kg (36376 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu PC150LGP-615830 kg (34899 lbs)
Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC16500 kg (36376 lbs)
Digging Depth
Komatsu PC150LGP-6485 cm (191 in.)
Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC521 cm (205 in.)
| Specification | Komatsu PC150LGP-6 Mid-Size Excavators | Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC Mid-Size Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mid-Size Excavator | Mid-Size Excavator |
| Weight | 15830 kg (34899 lbs) | 16500 kg (36376 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 64 kW (86 HP) | — |
| Digging Depth | 485 cm (191 in.) | 521 cm (205 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 485 cm (191 in.) | 521 cm (205 in.) |
| Max Loading Height | 609.6 cm (240.0 in.) | — |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 777.2 cm (306.0 in.) | 795.5 cm (313.2 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | 432.8 cm (170.4 in.) | — |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | 0.6 m2 (0.8 cu yds) | 0.4 m2 (0.5 cu yds) |
| Engine Make | Komatsu | Deutz |
| Engine Model | S4D102E-1 | TCD3.6L4 |
| Net Power | 64 kW (86 HP) | 91 kw (122 hp) |
| Gross Power | 68 kw (91 hp) | — |
| Rated Power | 2200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | 273 LPM (72.2 GPM) | — |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 90.1 l (23.8 gal) | 227 l (60.8 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | 358 Bar (5192 psi) | 350 Bar (5076 psi) |
| Operating Weight | 15830 kg (34899 lbs) | 16500 kg (36376 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 4.7 km (2.9 mph) | 6.8 km (4.2 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 12 RPM | 10 RPM |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbo-charged and aftercooled |
| Cooling Capacity | 18.5 l (4.9 gal) | — |
| Fuel Capacity | 240.4 l (63.5 gal) | — |
| Swing Drive Capacity | 2.6 l (0.7 gal) | — |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 17.8 l (4.7 gal) | — |
| Operating Voltage | Operating Voltage 24 V | Operating Voltage 24V |
| Ground Pressure | 26.9 kPa (3.9 psi) | 44.8 kPa (6.5 psi) |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | 2 | — |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | 7 | — |
| Number of Shoes per Side | 45 | — |
| Displacement | 3921.4 cc (239 cu. in.) | 3600.2 cc (220 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 80.0 cm (31.5 in.) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 853.4 cm (336.0 in.) | — |
| Alternator | 80 A | 28 V / 80 A |
| Drawbar Pull | 13.913 kg (30673 lbs) | 15.704 kg (34620.6 lbs) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 1.1 m2 (1.4 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | — | 0.8 m2 (1.1 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | — | 45.7 cm (18.0 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | — | 155.4 cm (61.2 in.) |
| Undercarriage Width | — | 374.9 cm (147.6 in.) |
| Emission | — | Tier 4 Final |
| Cab Height | — | 265.2 cm (104.4 in.) |
| Stroke | — | 12.2 cm (4.8 in) |
| Bore | — | 9.9 cm (3.9 in) |
| Max Dumping Height | — | 606.6 cm (238.8 in.) |
| Bucket Digging Force(SAE) | — | 6.934 kg (15287.1 lbs) |
| Bucket Digging Force(ISO) | — | 7.138 kg (15736.7 lbs) |
| Breakout force(ISO) | — | 8.158 kg (17984.8 lbs) |
| Breakout force(SAE) | — | 6.934 kg (15287.1 lbs) |
| Air cleaner | — | Dry-type |
| Urea tank | — | 20.1 l (5.3 gal) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Cat 315F L Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Cat 215 Vs Komatsu PC150LGP-6 ↗
- Cat 211B LC Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Komatsu PC160-6 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Hitachi ZX230 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- New Holland EC160 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Doosan DX140LCR-5 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- John Deere 690A Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗

