SPECS / COMPARISON
Caterpillar 211B LC vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC
A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar 211B LC and the Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Weight
Caterpillar 211B LC15750 kg (34723 lbs)
Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC16500 kg (36376 lbs)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar 211B LC15750 kg (34723 lbs)
Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC16500 kg (36376 lbs)
Digging Depth
Caterpillar 211B LC479 cm (188 in.)
Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC521 cm (205 in.)
| Specification | Caterpillar 211B LC Mid-Size Excavators | Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC Mid-Size Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mid-Size Excavator | Mid-Size Excavator |
| Weight | 15750 kg (34723 lbs) | 16500 kg (36376 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 78 kW (105 HP) | — |
| Digging Depth | 479 cm (188 in.) | 521 cm (205 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 479 cm (188 in.) | 521 cm (205 in.) |
| Max Loading Height | 566.9 cm (223.2 in.) | — |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 798.6 cm (314.4 in.) | 795.5 cm (313.2 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | 365.8 cm (144.0 in.) | — |
| Ground Clearance | 42.7 cm (16.8 in.) | 45.7 cm (18.0 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | 216.4 cm (85.2 in.) | 155.4 cm (61.2 in.) |
| Overall Width | 274.3 cm (108.0 in.) | — |
| Engine Make | Caterpillar | Deutz |
| Engine Model | 3114 | TCD3.6L4 |
| Net Power | 78 kW (105 HP) | 91 kw (122 hp) |
| Gross Power | 86.7 kW (116.3 HP) | — |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | 227 LPM (60.8 GPM) | — |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 205.2 l (54.2 gal) | 227 l (60.8 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | 320 Bar (4640 psi) | 350 Bar (5076 psi) |
| Operating Weight | 15750 kg (34723 lbs) | 16500 kg (36376 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 4.5 km (2.8 mph) | 6.8 km (4.2 mph) |
| Cab Height | 298.7 cm (117.6 in.) | 265.2 cm (104.4 in.) |
| Fuel Capacity | 270.3 l (71.4 gal) | — |
| Ground Pressure | 35.2 kPa (5.1 psi) | 44.8 kPa (6.5 psi) |
| Displacement | 4401.6 cc (269 cu. in.) | 3600.2 cc (220 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 60.2 cm (23.7 in.) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 795.5 cm (313.2 in.) | — |
| Track Gauge | 225.6 cm (88.8 in.) | — |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | 109.7 cm (43.2 in.) | — |
| Drawbar Pull | 14.276 kg (31473.3 lbs) | 15.704 kg (34620.6 lbs) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 0.4 m2 (0.5 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 1.1 m2 (1.4 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | — | 0.8 m2 (1.1 cu yds) |
| Undercarriage Width | — | 374.9 cm (147.6 in.) |
| Emission | — | Tier 4 Final |
| Rated Power | — | 1800 RPM |
| Swing Speed | — | 10 RPM |
| Aspiration | — | Turbo-charged and aftercooled |
| Operating Voltage | — | Operating Voltage 24V |
| Stroke | — | 12.2 cm (4.8 in) |
| Bore | — | 9.9 cm (3.9 in) |
| Max Dumping Height | — | 606.6 cm (238.8 in.) |
| Bucket Digging Force(SAE) | — | 6.934 kg (15287.1 lbs) |
| Bucket Digging Force(ISO) | — | 7.138 kg (15736.7 lbs) |
| Breakout force(ISO) | — | 8.158 kg (17984.8 lbs) |
| Breakout force(SAE) | — | 6.934 kg (15287.1 lbs) |
| Alternator | — | 28 V / 80 A |
| Air cleaner | — | Dry-type |
| Urea tank | — | 20.1 l (5.3 gal) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Cat 315F L Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Komatsu PC160-6 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Hitachi ZX230 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- New Holland EC160 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Komatsu PC150LGP-6 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- Doosan DX140LCR-5 Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗
- John Deere 690A Vs Liebherr R914 COMPACT LITRONIC ↗