Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Wacker Neuson WL30 vs Mitsubishi BD2HSS-HB2

A detailed comparison of the Wacker Neuson WL30 and the Mitsubishi BD2HSS-HB2. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Wacker Neuson WL3035.8 kW (48 hp)
Mitsubishi BD2HSS-HB237.3 kW (50 HP)
Operating Weight
Wacker Neuson WL303111.6 kg (6860 lbs)
Mitsubishi BD2HSS-HB24300.0 kg (9479.9 lbs)
SpecificationWacker Neuson WL30Wacker Neuson WL30Crawler DozersMitsubishi BD2HSS-HB2Mitsubishi BD2HSS-HB2Crawler Dozers
TypeWheel LoaderCrawler Dozer
Horsepower35.8 kW (48 hp)37.3 kW (50 HP)
Weight3111.6 kg (6860 lbs)—
Tipping Capacity2013.9 kg (4440 lbs)—
Max Speed20.0 km/h (12.4 mph)—
Engine Model404 C-22S4S
No Of Cylinders4—
Gross Power35.8 kW (48 hp)37.3 kW (50 HP)
Fuel Capacity53.4 l (14.1 gal)—
Hydraulic System Capacity32.2 l (8.5 gal)—
Transmission TypeHydrostaticDirect Drive
No of Forward Gears2—
Rear Axle Oscillation24 °—
Max Speed (Forward)20.0 km/h (12.4 mph)—
Pump typeGear pump—
Pump Flow49.2 LPM (13 GPM)—
Relief Pressure209.9 bar (3045 psi)—
Operating Weight3111.6 kg (6860 lbs)4300.0 kg (9479.9 lbs)
Tipping Load2013.9 kg (4440 lbs)—
Bucket Capacity (Heaped)0.5 m³ (0.6 cu yds)—
Breakout Force4123.2 kg (9090 lbs)—
Dump Clearance At Max Raise243.8 cm (96 in)—
Turning Radius304.8 cm (120 in)—
Wheelbase182.9 cm (72 in)—
Bucket Hinge Pin335.3 cm (132 in)—
Cab Height213.4 cm (84 in)234.7 cm (92.4 in.)
Overall Length457.2 cm (180 in)—
Width Over Tires121.9 cm (48 in)—
Engine Manufacturer—Mitsubishi
Displacement—3331.5 cc (203.3 cu in.)
Number of Forward Gears—3
Number of Reverse Gears—2
Width Over Track—231.6 cm (91.2 in.)
Length Overall—335.3 cm (132.0 in.)
Length without Blade—259.1 cm (102.0 in.)
Length of Track on Ground—189.0 cm (74.4 in.)
Track Gauge—161.5 cm (63.6 in.)
Ground Clearance—30.5 cm (12.0 in.)
Shoe Size—71.1 cm (28 in.)
Weight (Operating)—4300.0 kg (9479.9 lbs)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons