SPECS / COMPARISON
Terex RH40FHD vs Komatsu PC1250-7
A detailed comparison of the Terex RH40FHD and the Komatsu PC1250-7. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Terex RH40FHD496 kW (665 HP)
Komatsu PC1250-7485 kW (651 HP)
Weight
Terex RH40FHD105850 kg (233359 lbs)
Komatsu PC1250-7106700 kg (235233 lbs)
Operating Weight
Terex RH40FHD105850 kg (233359 lbs)
Komatsu PC1250-7106700 kg (235233 lbs)
| Specification | Terex RH40FHD Mining Shovels | Komatsu PC1250-7 Mining Shovels |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Mining Shovel | Mining Shovel |
| Weight | 105850 kg (233359 lbs) | 106700 kg (235233 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 496 kW (665 HP) | 485 kW (651 HP) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 1210.1 cm (476.4 in.) | 1502.7 cm (591.6 in.) |
| Max Digging Reach | 1051.6 cm (414.0 in.) | 1158.2 cm (456.0 in.) |
| Track Length | 5608.3 cm (2208.0 in.) | 6035.0 cm (2376.0 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | 469.4 cm (184.8 in.) | 502.9 cm (198.0 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | 6.0 m2 (7.9 cu yds) | 5.0 m2 (6.6 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | 7.0 m2 (9.2 cu yds) | 5.2 m2 (6.8 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | 6.0 m2 (7.9 cu yds) | 3.4 m2 (4.4 cu yds) |
| Upper Structure Ground Clearance | 173.7 cm (68.4 in.) | 179.8 cm (70.8 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | 429.8 cm (169.2 in.) | 487.7 cm (192.0 in.) |
| Backhoe Shoe Width | 3648.5 cm (1436.4 in.) | 3889.2 cm (1531.2 in.) |
| Loading Shovel Shoe Width | 722.4 cm (284.4 in.) | 841.2 cm (331.2 in.) |
| Engine Make | Terex | Komatsu |
| Engine Model | C18 | SAA6D170E-3 |
| Net Power | 496 kW (665 HP) | 485 kW (651 HP) |
| Gross Power | 522 kw (700 hp) | 485 kw (651 hp) |
| Rated Power | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 1900.3 l (502.0 gal) | 670.0 l (177.0 gal) |
| Operating Weight | 105850 kg (233359 lbs) | 106700 kg (235233 lbs) |
| Backhoe Operating Weight(Shoe) | 105.851 kg (233359.3 lbs) | 106.701 kg (235233.3 lbs) |
| Loading Shovel Operating Weight | 107.601 kg (237217.4 lbs) | 109.272 kg (240900 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 2.4 km (1.5 mph) | 3.2 km (2 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 5.6 RPM | 5.5 RPM |
| Cab Height | 573.0 cm (225.6 in.) | 393.2 cm (154.8 in.) |
| Height to Top of Boom(Shovel) | 560.8 cm (220.8 in.) | 621.8 cm (244.8 in.) |
| Height of Track | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) | — |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged, aftercooled |
| Fuel Capacity | 1650.1 l (435.9 gal) | 1360.1 l (359.3 gal) |
| Operating Voltage | Operating Voltage 24 V | Operating Voltage 24 V |
| Backhoe Ground Pressure - Shoe | 200.6 kPa (29.1 psi) | 137.9 kPa (20.0 psi) |
| Loading Shovel Ground Pressure | 171.0 kPa (24.8 psi) | 140.7 kPa (20.4 psi) |
| Max Dumping Height | 890.0 cm (350.4 in.) | 868.7 cm (342.0 in.) |
| Displacement | 18101.2 cc (1105 cu. in.) | 23154.9 cc (1413 cu. in.) |
| Max Cutting Height | 1252.7 cm (493.2 in.) | 1341.1 cm (528.0 in.) |
| Alternator | 175 A | 50 A |
| Track Gauge | 381.0 cm (150.0 in.) | 390.1 cm (153.6 in.) |
| Number of Lower Rollers | 8 | 8 |
| Number of Upper Rollers | 1 | 3 |
| Digging Depth | — | 936 cm (368 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | — | 936 cm (368 in.) |
| Max Loading Height | — | 868.7 cm (342.0 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | — | 762.0 cm (300.0 in.) |
| Overall Length | — | 1603.2 cm (631.2 in.) |
| Overall Length with Shovel | — | 1094.2 cm (430.8 in.) |
| Ground Clearance | — | 100.6 cm (39.6 in.) |
| Overall Width | — | 460.2 cm (181.2 in.) |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 988 LPM (261.1 GPM) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 343 Bar (4979 psi) |
| Height to Top of Boom | — | 606.6 cm (238.8 in.) |
| Cooling Capacity | — | 140.1 l (37.0 gal) |
| Swing Drive Capacity | — | 24.2 l (6.4 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | — | 56.0 l (14.8 gal) |
| Arm Crowd Force | — | 39916.8 kg (88000 lbs) |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | — | 3 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | — | 8 |
| Number of Shoes per Side | — | 48 |
| Shoe Size | — | 70.1 cm (27.6 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 179.8 cm (70.8 in.) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.