Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Mahindra eMax 25 vs Mahindra eMax 22

A detailed comparison of the Mahindra eMax 25 and the Mahindra eMax 22. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Mahindra eMax 2517.9 kW (24.0 HP)
Mahindra eMax 2216.4 kW (22.0 HP)
Weight
Mahindra eMax 25700.0 kg (1543.2 lbs)
Mahindra eMax 22698.0 kg (1538.8 lbs)
Lift Capacity
Mahindra eMax 25600.0 kg (1322.8 lbs)
Mahindra eMax 22598.0 kg (1318.4 lbs)
SpecificationMahindra eMax 25Mahindra eMax 25Compact and Multi-Purpose TractorsMahindra eMax 22Mahindra eMax 22Compact and Multi-Purpose Tractors
Tractor TypeSub-Compact Utility TractorSub-Compact Utility Tractor
Horsepower17.9 kW (24.0 HP)16.4 kW (22.0 HP)
Weight700.0 kg (1543.2 lbs)698.0 kg (1538.8 lbs)
Lift Capacity600.0 kg (1322.8 lbs)598.0 kg (1318.4 lbs)
Transmission TypeHydrostaticHydrostatic
Length260.0 cm (102.4 in.)260.0 cm (102.4 in.)
Pump Flow17.0 LPM (4.5 GPM)17.0 LPM (4.5 GPM)
Years Made2014-20162014-2016
Engine ModelDaedong 3C100Daedong 3C100
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders33
Displacement1007 cc (61.5 cu in.)1007 cc (61.5 cu in.)
Bore7.49 cm (2.95 in.)7.49 cm (2.95 in.)
Stroke7.59 cm (2.99 in.)7.59 cm (2.99 in.)
Rear PTO TypeIndependentIndependent or live
Rear PTO Speed540 RPM540 RPM
Middle PTO Speed2000 RPM2000 RPM
Rated RPM3000 RPM3000 RPM
Compression Ratio22.0:122.0:1
Battery12 V12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Width119.0 cm (46.9 in.)119.0 cm (46.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity23.0 l (6.1 gal)23.1 l (6.1 gal)
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×4 MFWD 4WD4×4 MFWD 4WD
BrakesWet discWet disc
Drawbar CategoryII
Cabin TypeTwo-post foldable ROPSTwo-post foldable ROPS
Steering TypePowerPower
Front TiresAg: 6×12Ag: 6×12
Rear TiresAg: 9.5×16Ag: 9.5×16
Hydraulic TypeOpen centerOpen center
Steering Flow9.8 LPM (2.6 GPM)9.8 LPM (2.6 GPM)
Valves11

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons