Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Kubota B17X vs International Harvester 234

A detailed comparison of the Kubota B17X and the International Harvester 234. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Kubota B17X12.5 kW (16.8 HP)
International Harvester 23413.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weight
Kubota B17X575.0 kg (1267.7 lbs)
International Harvester 234550.0 kg (1212.5 lbs)
SpecificationKubota B17XKubota B17XCompact and Multi-Purpose TractorsInternational Harvester 234International Harvester 234Compact and Multi-Purpose Tractors
Tractor TypeSub-Compact Utility TractorCompact Utility Tractor
Horsepower12.5 kW (16.8 HP)13.4 kW (18.0 HP)
Weight575.0 kg (1267.7 lbs)550.0 kg (1212.5 lbs)
Length204.0 cm (80.3 in.)262.0 cm (103.1 in.)
Years Made2015-1982-1984
Engine ModelKubota D1005Mitsubishi
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders33
Displacement1001 cc (61.1 cu in.)849 cc (51.8 cu in.)
Bore7.59 cm (2.99 in.)6.81 cm (2.68 in.)
Stroke7.37 cm (2.90 in.)7.80 cm (3.07 in.)
Rear PTO Speed540 RPM540 RPM
Rated RPM2600 RPM2700 RPM
Battery12 V—
StarterElectricElectric
Height183.0 cm (72.0 in.)117.0 cm (46.1 in.)
Width90.0 cm (35.4 in.)—
Wheelbase127.0 cm (50.0 in.)142.0 cm (55.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity14.0 l (3.7 gal)18.2 l (4.8 gal)
Gears6 forward and 2 reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×4 MFWD 4WD4×2 2WD or 4×4 FWA 4WD
BrakesWet disc type—
Cabin TypeOpen operator station with two-post ROPSTwo-post ROPS
Steering TypeHydrostatic power—
Front TiresAg: 5.00-12—
Rear TiresAg: 8-18—
Transmission Type—Hydrostatic
Rear PTO Type—Transmission
Front PTO Type—Independent
Front PTO Speed—2.700 RPM
Oil Capacity—3.0 l (0.8 gal)
Coolant Capacity—4.9 l (1.3 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity—11.7 l (3.1 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—11.7 l (3.1 gal)
Max. Travel Speed—7.4 km/h (Forward: 10.1 MPH (16.3 km/h) Reverse: 4.6 MPH)
Drawbar Category—I

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons