Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Ford 650 vs Caterpillar 416C

A detailed comparison of the Ford 650 and the Caterpillar 416C. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Ford 65056.3 kW (75.6 HP)
Caterpillar 416C55.9 kW (75.0 HP)
SpecificationFord 650Ford 650Backhoe LoadersCaterpillar 416CCaterpillar 416CBackhoe Loaders
Horsepower56.3 kW (75.6 HP)55.9 kW (75.0 HP)
Years Made1975-19771996-2001
Engine ModelFordCaterpillar 3054
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement4195 cc (256.0 cu in.)4392 cc (268.0 cu in.)
Bore11.20 cm (4.41 in.)10.49 cm (4.13 in.)
Stroke10.69 cm (4.21 in.)12.70 cm (5.00 in.)
StarterElectricElectric
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD or 4×4 MFWD 4WD
Cabin TypeOpen operator station with four-post ROPSFour-post ROPS
Weight—6335.0 kg (13966.3 lbs)
Length—697.0 cm (274.4 in.)
Height—358.0 cm (140.9 in.)
Wheelbase—210.0 cm (82.7 in.)
Ground Clearance—29.0 cm (11.4 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity—128.0 l (33.8 gal)
Oil Capacity—7.3 l (1.9 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—79.0 l (20.9 gal)
Max. Travel Speed—32.8 km/h (Forward: 20.4 MPH (32.8 km/h) Reverse: 20.4 MPH)
Brakes—Multiple discs
Steering Type—Hydrostatic power
Front Tires—11 Lx16 , 12.5/80-18
Rear Tires—16.9×24
Total Flow—163.2 LPM (43.1 GPM)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons