Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Caterpillar 416B vs Ford 650

A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar 416B and the Ford 650. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Caterpillar 416B57.2 kW (76.7 HP)
Ford 65056.3 kW (75.6 HP)
SpecificationCaterpillar 416BCaterpillar 416BBackhoe LoadersFord 650Ford 650Backhoe Loaders
Horsepower57.2 kW (76.7 HP)56.3 kW (75.6 HP)
Transmission TypePower shuttle—
Length683.8 cm (269.2 in.)—
Pump Flow155.2 LPM (41.0 GPM)—
Years Made1992-19961975-1977
Engine ModelCaterpillar 3054Ford
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement3982 cc (243.0 cu in.)4195 cc (256.0 cu in.)
Bore10.01 cm (3.94 in.)11.20 cm (4.41 in.)
Stroke12.70 cm (5.00 in.)10.69 cm (4.21 in.)
Rated RPM2200 RPM—
Compression Ratio16.0:1—
Battery12 V, CCA 700A—
StarterElectricElectric
Height272.0 cm (Cab Height: 107.1 in.)—
Wheelbase206.7 cm (2WD: 82.7 in. (210.0 cm) 4WD: 81.4 in.)—
Ground Clearance29.7 cm (11.7 in.)—
Fuel Tank Capacity106.0 l (28.0 gal)—
Oil Capacity8.0 l (2.1 gal)—
Coolant Capacity21.0 l (5.5 gal)—
Transmission Oil Capacity10.0 l (2.6 gal)—
Hydraulic Capacity79.0 l (20.9 gal)—
Gears4 forward and 4 reverse—
Chassis4×2 2WD or 4×4 MFWD 4WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed32.6 km/h (Forward: 20.1 MPH (32.4 km/h) Reverse: 20.3 MPH)—
BrakesWet disc—
Cabin TypeROPS canopy or cabOpen operator station with four-post ROPS
Steering TypeHydrostatic power—
Front TiresAg: 11L-16 , 10.5-20—
Rear TiresAg: 16.9-24 , 19.5L-24—
Hydraulic TypeClosed center—
Working Pressure206.8 bar (3000.0 psi)—

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons