Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Farmall 756 vs International Harvester 756

A detailed comparison of the Farmall 756 and the International Harvester 756. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Farmall 7563790.0 kg (8355.5 lbs)
International Harvester 7563800.0 kg (8377.6 lbs)
SpecificationFarmall 756Farmall 756Agricultural TractorsInternational Harvester 756International Harvester 756Agricultural Tractors
Tractor TypeRow-Crop TractorUtility Tractor
Weight3790.0 kg (8355.5 lbs)3800.0 kg (8377.6 lbs)
Transmission TypeTorque amplifier—
Length416.0 cm (163.8 in.)—
Years Made1967-19711967-1983
Engine ModelInternational Harvester C-291Interntional Harvester D310
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeGasoline/LP-gasDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement4768 cc (291.0 cu in.)5080 cc (310.0 cu in.)
Bore9.50 cm (3.74 in.)9.80 cm (3.86 in.)
Stroke11.20 cm (4.41 in.)11.10 cm (4.37 in.)
Rear PTO TypeIndependentIndependent
Rear PTO Speed1000, 540/1000 RPM540 /1.000 RPM
Compression Ratio7.6:1—
BatteryDiesel: Two 6V, 130Ah;Gas/LP-gas: One 12V, 60Ah—
StarterElectricElectric
Height208.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 81.9 in.)—
Wheelbase266.0 cm (104.7 in.)256.0 cm (100.8 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity147.6 l (Gasoline/diesel: 33.0 gal (125.0 l) LP-gas: 39.0 gal)125.0 l (33.0 gal)
Oil Capacity8.5 l (2.2 gal)—
Coolant Capacity19.4 l (5.1 gal)—
Transmission Oil Capacity64.4 l (17.0 gal)—
Gears16 forward and 8 reverse8 forward and 4 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD or 4×4 MFWD 4WD4×2 2WD or 4×4 MFWD 4WD
Max. Travel Speed14.5 km/h (Forward: 18.5 MPH (29.8 km/h) Reverse: 9.0 MPH)—
BrakesIndependent hydraulic disc—
Drawbar CategoryIIII
Cabin TypeOpen operator station or CabOpen operator station
Hitch TypeIH Fast Hitch—
Steering TypeHydrostatic power—
Front TiresAg: 6.50-16Ag: 9.5L-15
Rear TiresAg: 15.5-38Ag: 18.4-34
Pump Flow—45.4 LPM (12.0 GPM)
Hydraulic Type—Open center

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons