Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet GT2000 vs Snapper LT200 H48

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet GT2000 and the Snapper LT200 H48. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet GT200014.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Snapper LT200 H4814.9 kW (20.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet GT2000Cub Cadet GT2000Garden and Lawn TractorsSnapper LT200 H48Snapper LT200 H48Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeGarden TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower14.9 kW (20.0 HP)14.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticBelt-driven hydrostatic
Length193.0 cm (76.0 in.)167.0 cm (65.7 in.)
Years Made2011-20142003-2005
Engine ModelKohler Command CH640Briggs & Stratton 40G777
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, inline4-stroke, air-cooled
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement640 cc (39.1 cu in.)655 cc (40.0 cu in.)
Bore7.59 cm (2.99 in.)7.49 cm (2.95 in.)
Stroke6.60 cm (2.60 in.)7.29 cm (2.87 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with electric clutch
Rated RPM3600 RPM—
Battery12 V, CCA 275A12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Wheelbase128.0 cm (50.4 in.)124.0 cm (48.8 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity17.0 l (4.5 gal)7.6 l (2.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.9 l (0.5 gal)—
Transmission Oil Capacity5.4 l (1.4 gal)—
Engine Oil TypeSAE 10W-30—
Transmission ModelHydro-Gear BDU-10Tuff Torq K46
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed5.6 km/h (Forward: 6.5 MPH (10.5 km/h) Reverse: 3.5 MPH)8.0 km/h (Forward: 6.5 MPH (10.5 km/h) Reverse: 5.0 MPH)
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManual sector and pinionManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 16×6.5-8Lawn/turf: 15×5.50-6
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 23×9.5-12Lawn/turf: 20×10.00-8
Weight—281.0 kg (619.5 lbs)
Height—101.0 cm (39.8 in.)
Width—147.0 cm (57.9 in.)
Brakes—Dry disc

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons