Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 2084 vs Cub Cadet GT2000

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 2084 and the Cub Cadet GT2000. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 208414.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Cub Cadet GT200014.9 kW (20.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 2084Cub Cadet 2084Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet GT2000Cub Cadet GT2000Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeGarden TractorGarden Tractor
Horsepower14.9 kW (20.0 HP)14.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Weight470.0 kg (1036.2 lbs)—
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length199.0 cm (78.3 in.)193.0 cm (76.0 in.)
Years Made1993-19942011-2014
Engine ModelKohler CH20Kohler Command CH640
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin4-stroke, air-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement624 cc (38.1 cu in.)640 cc (39.1 cu in.)
Bore7.70 cm (3.03 in.)7.59 cm (2.99 in.)
Stroke6.71 cm (2.64 in.)6.60 cm (2.60 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with electric clutch
Battery12 V12 V, CCA 275A
StarterElectricElectric
Height120.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 47.2 in.)—
Wheelbase131.0 cm (51.6 in.)128.0 cm (50.4 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity18.9 l (5.0 gal)17.0 l (4.5 gal)
Oil Capacity1.8 l (0.5 gal)1.9 l (0.5 gal)
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)5.6 km/h (Forward: 6.5 MPH (10.5 km/h) Reverse: 3.5 MPH)
BrakesDisc—
Drawbar Category0—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypePowerManual sector and pinion
Front TiresLawn/turf: 18×8.5-8Lawn/turf: 16×6.5-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 26×12.0-12Lawn/turf: 23×9.5-12
Rated RPM—3600 RPM
Transmission Oil Capacity—5.4 l (1.4 gal)
Engine Oil Type—SAE 10W-30
Transmission Model—Hydro-Gear BDU-10

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons