Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 2082 vs Snapper ST2046

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 2082 and the Snapper ST2046. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 208214.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Snapper ST204614.9 kW (20.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 2082Cub Cadet 2082Garden and Lawn TractorsSnapper ST2046Snapper ST2046Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower14.9 kW (20.0 HP)14.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Weight458.0 kg (1009.7 lbs)—
Transmission TypeShaft-driven hydrostaticBelt-driven hydrostatic
Length199.0 cm (78.3 in.)175.0 cm (68.9 in.)
Years Made1990-19931997-1998
Engine ModelKohler M20SBriggs & Stratton 40R877 Intek
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement770 cc (47.0 cu in.)655 cc (40.0 cu in.)
Bore7.90 cm (3.11 in.)7.49 cm (2.95 in.)
Stroke7.80 cm (3.07 in.)7.29 cm (2.87 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with mechanical clutch
Spark PlugChampion RV15YC—
Battery12 V, CCA 500A12 V, CCA 230A
StarterElectricElectric
Height120.0 cm (47.2 in.)106.0 cm (41.7 in.)
Wheelbase131.0 cm (51.6 in.)—
Ground Clearance19.0 cm (7.5 in.)—
Fuel Tank Capacity18.9 l (5.0 gal)11.4 l (3.0 gal)
Oil Capacity2.6 l (0.7 gal)—
Transmission Oil Capacity6.6 l (1.7 gal)—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.4 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 4.0 MPH)4.8 km/h (Forward: 5.5 MPH (8.8 km/h) Reverse: 3.0 MPH)
BrakesDual discDisk
Drawbar Category0—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Front TiresLawn/turf: 18×8.50-8Lawn/turf: 15×6.00-6
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 26×12.00-12Lawn/turf: 20×8.00-8
Rated RPM—3600 RPM
Width—144.0 cm (56.7 in.)
Transmission Model—Hydro-Gear T2
Steering Type—Manual

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons