Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 3205 vs Snapper ST2046

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 3205 and the Snapper ST2046. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 320514.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Snapper ST204614.9 kW (20.0 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 3205Cub Cadet 3205Garden and Lawn TractorsSnapper ST2046Snapper ST2046Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeGarden TractorLawn Tractor
Horsepower14.9 kW (20.0 HP)14.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Weight326.0 kg (718.7 lbs)—
Transmission TypeHydrostaticBelt-driven hydrostatic
Length183.0 cm (72.0 in.)175.0 cm (68.9 in.)
Years Made1998-19991997-1998
Engine ModelKawasaki FD620DBriggs & Stratton 40R877 Intek
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled4-stroke, air-cooled, V-twin
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement617 cc (37.7 cu in.)655 cc (40.0 cu in.)
Bore7.59 cm (2.99 in.)7.49 cm (2.95 in.)
Stroke6.81 cm (2.68 in.)7.29 cm (2.87 in.)
Front PTO TypeIndependent with electric clutchIndependent with mechanical clutch
Rated RPM3600 RPM3600 RPM
Compression Ratio9.0:1—
Spark PlugNGK: BMR4A—
Battery12 V, CCA 435A12 V, CCA 230A
StarterElectricElectric
Height110.0 cm (43.3 in.)106.0 cm (41.7 in.)
Wheelbase125.0 cm (49.2 in.)—
Ground Clearance15.0 cm (5.9 in.)—
Fuel Tank Capacity17.0 l (4.5 gal)11.4 l (3.0 gal)
Oil Capacity1.5 l (0.4 gal)—
Transmission Oil Capacity4.3 l (1.1 gal)—
Engine Oil TypeSAE 10W-40, 10W-30, 5W-20—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
BrakesExternal diskDisk
Drawbar Category0—
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypePowerManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 16×7.5-8Lawn/turf: 15×6.00-6
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 24×10.5-12Lawn/turf: 20×8.00-8
Width—144.0 cm (56.7 in.)
Transmission Model—Hydro-Gear T2
Max. Travel Speed—4.8 km/h (Forward: 5.5 MPH (8.8 km/h) Reverse: 3.0 MPH)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons