Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Cub Cadet 1020 vs Cub Cadet 108

A detailed comparison of the Cub Cadet 1020 and the Cub Cadet 108. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Cub Cadet 10207.5 kW (10.1 HP)
Cub Cadet 1087.5 kW (10.1 HP)
SpecificationCub Cadet 1020Cub Cadet 1020Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 108Cub Cadet 108Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeLawn TractorGarden Tractor
Horsepower7.5 kW (10.1 HP)7.5 kW (10.1 HP)
Weight184.0 kg (405.7 lbs)—
Transmission TypeHydrostaticCreeper
Length173.0 cm (68.1 in.)175.0 cm (68.9 in.)
Years Made1988-19911971-1974
Engine ModelBriggs & StrattonKohler K241A
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled, inline4-stroke, air-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders11
Displacement399 cc (24.3 cu in.)391 cc (23.9 cu in.)
Bore8.71 cm (3.43 in.)8.26 cm (3.25 in.)
Stroke6.71 cm (2.64 in.)7.29 cm (2.87 in.)
Rear PTO TypeIndependent with mechanical clutchTransmission with dry disc clutch
Battery12 V12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Wheelbase114.0 cm (44.9 in.)111.0 cm (43.7 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity11.4 l (3.0 gal)7.6 l (2.0 gal)
GearsInfinite forward and reverse6 forward and 2 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed4.8 km/h (Forward: 5.5 MPH (8.8 km/h) Reverse: 3.0 MPH)4.0 km/h (Forward: 6.8 MPH (10.9 km/h) Reverse: 2.5 MPH)
BrakesMechanical discDry disc
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManual sector-and-pinionManual
Front TiresLawn/turft: 15×6-6Lawn/turf: 4.80×4.00-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 18×8.5-8Lawn/turf: 6-12
Rear PTO Speed—515 RPM
Front PTO Type—Independent with mechanical clutch
Front PTO Speed—3.600 rpm
Rated RPM—3600 RPM
Spark Plug—Champion H10
Height—104.0 cm (40.9 in.)
Oil Capacity—1.4 l (0.4 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity—3.3 l (0.9 gal)
Engine Oil Type—SAE 5W-20, 10W, 30
Drawbar Category—Sleeve hitch

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons