Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Caterpillar D6K XL vs Komatsu D50P-18

A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar D6K XL and the Komatsu D50P-18. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Caterpillar D6K XL93.2 kW (125 HP)
Komatsu D50P-1896.9 kW (130 HP)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar D6K XL12886.1 kg (28409 lbs)
Komatsu D50P-1814820.0 kg (32672.6 lbs)
SpecificationCaterpillar D6K XLCaterpillar D6K XLCrawler DozersKomatsu D50P-18Komatsu D50P-18Crawler Dozers
TypeCrawler DozerCrawler Dozer
Horsepower93.2 kW (125 HP)96.9 kW (130 HP)
Operating Weight12886.1 kg (28409 lbs)14820.0 kg (32672.6 lbs)
Engine ManufacturerCaterpillarKomatsu
Engine ModelC6.6 ACERT6 D125-1
Net Power93.2 kW (125 HP)—
Number of Cylinders66
Displacement6604.0 cc (403 cu in.)11041.6 cc (673.8 cu in.)
Power Measured RPM2100 RPM1750 RPM
Alternator Supplied Amp.95 A—
Alternator95 A—
Battery24 V—
Transmission TypeHydrostaticDirect Drive
Max Speed Forward10.1 km/h (6.3 mph)—
Max Speed Reverse10.1 km/h (6.3 mph)—
Ground Pressure0.4 bar (6.2 psi)—
Fuel Capacity294.9 l (77.9 gal)—
Engine Oil Capacity16.7 l (4.4 gal)—
Cooling System Capacity24.2 l (6.4 gal)—
Hydraulic Capacity57.9 l (15.3 gal)—
Final Drives Capacity15.1 l (4 gal)—
Cab Height295.7 cm (116.4 in.)298.7 cm (117.6 in.)
Width Over Track234.7 cm (92.4 in.)292.6 cm (115.2 in.)
Length Overall499.9 cm (196.8 in.)518.2 cm (204.0 in.)
Length without Blade381.0 cm (150.0 in.)414.5 cm (163.2 in.)
Length of Track on Ground265.2 cm (104.4 in.)307.8 cm (121.2 in.)
Track Gauge179.8 cm (70.8 in.)207.3 cm (81.6 in.)
Ground Clearance36.6 cm (14.4 in.)42.7 cm (16.8 in.)
Ground Contact Area76200.0 cm³ (4650 cu in.)—
No of Shoes Per Side4049
No of Track Rollers Per Side78
Shoe Size55.9 cm (22 in.)86.1 cm (33.9 in.)
Weight (Operating)12886.1 kg (28409 lbs)14820.0 kg (32672.6 lbs)
Gross Power—96.9 kW (130 HP)
Number of Forward Gears—5
Number of Reverse Gears—4
No of Carrier Rollers Per Side—2

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons