SPECS / COMPARISON
Caterpillar 385B L vs Hitachi ZX870LCR-3
A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar 385B L and the Hitachi ZX870LCR-3. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Caterpillar 385B L383 kW (513 HP)
Hitachi ZX870LCR-3397 kW (532 HP)
Weight
Caterpillar 385B L86350 kg (190370 lbs)
Hitachi ZX870LCR-385500 kg (188495 lbs)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar 385B L86350 kg (190370 lbs)
Hitachi ZX870LCR-385500 kg (188495 lbs)
| Specification | Caterpillar 385B L Large Excavators | Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 Large Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Large Excavator | Large Excavator |
| Weight | 86350 kg (190370 lbs) | 85500 kg (188495 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 383 kW (513 HP) | 397 kW (532 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 1158 cm (456 in.) | 716 cm (282 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 1158 cm (456 in.) | 716 cm (282 in.) |
| Max Digging Reach | 1158.2 cm (456.0 in.) | — |
| Engine Make | Caterpillar | Isuzu |
| Engine Model | 3456 | AH-6WG1XYSA-03 |
| Net Power | 383 kW (513 HP) | 397 kW (532 HP) |
| Gross Power | 391.0 kW (524.3 HP) | 405.1 kW (543.3 HP) |
| Operating Weight | 86350 kg (190370 lbs) | 85500 kg (188495 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 4.5 km (2.8 mph) | 4.2 km (2.6 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 6.2 RPM | 7.3 RPM |
| Cooling Capacity | 101.1 l (26.7 gal) | 116.2 l (30.7 gal) |
| Fuel Capacity | 1241.6 l (328.0 gal) | 1120.1 l (295.9 gal) |
| Swing Drive Capacity | 18.9 l (5.0 gal) | 15.1 l (4.0 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 79.9 l (21.1 gal) | 57.2 l (15.1 gal) |
| Stroke | 17.3 cm (6.8 in) | — |
| Bore | 14.2 cm (5.6 in) | — |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | 3 | 3 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | 8 | 9 |
| Number of Shoes per Side | 47 | 51 |
| Displacement | 15797.1 cc (964 cu. in.) | 15682.4 cc (957 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 76.2 cm (30.0 in.) | 65.0 cm (25.6 in.) |
| Drawbar Pull | 60.342 kg (133030 lbs) | — |
| Max Loading Height | — | 813.8 cm (320.4 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | — | 1204.0 cm (474.0 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | — | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Overall Length | — | 1478.3 cm (582.0 in.) |
| Track Length | — | 6126.5 cm (2412.0 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | — | 512.1 cm (201.6 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 3.5 m2 (4.6 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | — | 91.4 cm (36.0 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | — | 460.2 cm (181.2 in.) |
| Overall Width | — | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) |
| Rated Power | — | 1800 RPM |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 1.056 LPM (279 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | — | 790.0 l (208.7 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 343 Bar (4975 psi) |
| Cab Height | — | 381.0 cm (150.0 in.) |
| Aspiration | — | Turbocharged |
| Max Torque | — | 2250.1 Nm (1659.6 ft-lbs) |
| Ground Pressure | — | 116.5 kPa (16.9 psi) |
| Max Cutting Height | — | 1204.0 cm (474.0 in.) |
| Track Gauge | — | 347.5 cm (136.8 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 170.7 cm (67.2 in.) |
| Torque Power | — | 1600 RPM |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 Vs Hitachi ZX870H-3 ↗
- Hitachi ZX870LCH-3 Vs Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 ↗
- Cat 385C FS Vs Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 ↗
- Liebherr R974B Vs Cat 385B L ↗
- Cat 385B L Vs Cat 385C L ↗
- Komatsu H135S Vs Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 ↗
- Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 Vs John Deere 850D LC ↗
- Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 Vs Cat 390F L ↗
- Cat 385B L Vs Hitachi ZX870LC-6 ↗
- Cat 390D L Vs Cat 385B L ↗
- Cat 385B L Vs Cat 390F L ↗