SPECS / COMPARISON
Caterpillar 385B L vs Caterpillar 385C L
A detailed comparison of the Caterpillar 385B L and the Caterpillar 385C L. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Caterpillar 385B L383 kW (513 HP)
Caterpillar 385C L395 kW (530 HP)
Weight
Caterpillar 385B L86350 kg (190370 lbs)
Caterpillar 385C L84130 kg (185475 lbs)
Operating Weight
Caterpillar 385B L86350 kg (190370 lbs)
Caterpillar 385C L84130 kg (185475 lbs)
| Specification | Caterpillar 385B L Large Excavators | Caterpillar 385C LLarge Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Large Excavator | Large Excavator |
| Weight | 86350 kg (190370 lbs) | 84130 kg (185475 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 383 kW (513 HP) | 395 kW (530 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 1158 cm (456 in.) | 716 cm (282 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 1158 cm (456 in.) | 716 cm (282 in.) |
| Max Digging Reach | 1158.2 cm (456.0 in.) | — |
| Engine Make | Caterpillar | Caterpillar |
| Engine Model | 3456 | C18 ACERT |
| Net Power | 383 kW (513 HP) | 395 kW (530 HP) |
| Gross Power | 391.0 kW (524.3 HP) | 395 kw (530 hp) |
| Operating Weight | 86350 kg (190370 lbs) | 84130 kg (185475 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 4.5 km (2.8 mph) | 4.5 km (2.8 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 6.2 RPM | 6.5 RPM |
| Cooling Capacity | 101.1 l (26.7 gal) | 101.1 l (26.7 gal) |
| Fuel Capacity | 1241.6 l (328.0 gal) | 1240.1 l (327.6 gal) |
| Swing Drive Capacity | 18.9 l (5.0 gal) | 19.3 l (5.1 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 79.9 l (21.1 gal) | 65.1 l (17.2 gal) |
| Stroke | 17.3 cm (6.8 in) | 18.3 cm (7.2 in) |
| Bore | 14.2 cm (5.6 in) | 14.7 cm (5.8 in) |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | 3 | 3 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | 8 | 9 |
| Number of Shoes per Side | 47 | 51 |
| Displacement | 15797.1 cc (964 cu. in.) | 18124.1 cc (1106 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 76.2 cm (30.0 in.) | 75.2 cm (29.6 in.) |
| Drawbar Pull | 60.342 kg (133030 lbs) | 60.367 kg (133086.9 lbs) |
| Max Loading Height | — | 807.7 cm (318.0 in.) |
| Max Reach Along Ground | — | 1228.3 cm (483.6 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | — | 466.3 cm (183.6 in.) |
| Overall Length | — | 1347.2 cm (530.4 in.) |
| Track Length | — | 6126.5 cm (2412.0 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | — | 512.1 cm (201.6 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | — | 3.0 m2 (3.9 cu yds) |
| Max Bucket Capacity | — | 5.4 m2 (7.1 cu yds) |
| Ground Clearance | — | 91.4 cm (36.0 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | — | 460.2 cm (181.2 in.) |
| Overall Width | — | 350.5 cm (138.0 in.) |
| Rated Power | — | 1800 RPM |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | — | 977 LPM (258.9 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | — | 995.2 l (262.9 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | — | 320 Bar (4642 psi) |
| Cab Height | — | 378.0 cm (148.8 in.) |
| Max Cutting Height | — | 1255.8 cm (494.4 in.) |
| Track Gauge | — | 353.6 cm (139.2 in.) |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | — | 158.5 cm (62.4 in.) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Hitachi ZX870LC-6 Vs Cat 385C L ↗
- Liebherr R974B Vs Cat 385B L ↗
- Cat 385B L Vs Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 ↗
- Cat 385C L Vs Cat 385B ↗
- Liebherr R974B Vs Cat 385C L ↗
- Cat 385C L Vs Hitachi ZX870LCH-3 ↗
- Cat 385C L Vs Cat 385C ↗
- Cat 385C L Vs John Deere 850D LC ↗
- Cat 385B L Vs Hitachi ZX870LC-6 ↗
- Cat 390D L Vs Cat 385B L ↗
- Cat 385B L Vs Cat 390F L ↗