SPECS / COMPARISON
Case 430CK Construction King vs Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull
A detailed comparison of the Case 430CK Construction King and the Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Case 430CK Construction King31.3 kW (42.0 HP)
Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull29.8 kW (39.9 HP)
Weight
Case 430CK Construction King1645.0 kg (Gasoline: 3439.2 lbs (1560.0 kg) Diesel: 3626.6 lbs)
Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull1390.0 kg (3064.4 lbs)
| Specification | Case 430CK Construction King Backhoe Loaders | Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull Backhoe Loaders |
|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 31.3 kW (42.0 HP) | 29.8 kW (39.9 HP) |
| Weight | 1645.0 kg (Gasoline: 3439.2 lbs (1560.0 kg) Diesel: 3626.6 lbs) | 1390.0 kg (3064.4 lbs) |
| Transmission Type | Mechanical shuttle with dry disc clutch | Mechanical shuttle with dry disc clutch |
| Length | 299.0 cm (Gasoline: 116.5 in. (296.0 cm) Diesel: 117.7 in.) | 299.0 cm (117.7 in.) |
| Pump Flow | 62.5 LPM (Loader: 13.5 GPM (51.1 LPM) Backhoe: 16.5 GPM) | 15.1 LPM (4.0 GPM) |
| Years Made | 1960-1966 | 1958-1967 |
| Engine Model | J.I. Case G-188D | Continental Z-134 |
| Engine Type | 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline | 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3081 cc (188.0 cu in.) | 2196 cc (134.0 cu in.) |
| Bore | 9.70 cm (3.82 in.) | 8.41 cm (3.31 in.) |
| Stroke | 10.49 cm (4.13 in.) | 9.80 cm (3.86 in.) |
| Rear PTO Type | Transmission or live | Transmission or live |
| Rear PTO Speed | 540 RPM | 540 RPM |
| Torque Power | 1250 RPM | 1200 RPM |
| Torque Speed | 180.3 N·m (133.0 lb-ft) | 146.4 N·m (108.0 lb-ft) |
| Rated RPM | 1750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 6.6:1 |
| Spark Plug | Champion D16, Autolite BT3 | — |
| Starter | Electric | Electric |
| Height | 150.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 59.1 in.) | 135.0 cm (53.1 in.) |
| Wheelbase | 199.0 cm (Gasoline: 77.2 in. (196.0 cm) Diesel: 78.3 in.) | — |
| Ground Clearance | 39.0 cm (Front axle: 15.4 in.) | 33.0 cm (13.0 in.) |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83.3 l (22.0 gal) | — |
| Oil Capacity | 4.7 l (1.2 gal) | — |
| Coolant Capacity | 15.6 l (4.1 gal) | — |
| Transmission Oil Capacity | 16.1 l (4.3 gal) | — |
| Engine Oil Type | SAE 10W, 20W, 30 | — |
| Gears | 4 forward and 4 reverse | 6 forward and 6 reverse |
| Chassis | 4×2 2WD | 4×2 2WD |
| Max. Travel Speed | 34.8 km/h (Forward: 17.3 MPH (27.8 km/h) Reverse: 21.6 MPH) | 28.9 km/h (Forward: 19.8 MPH (31.9 km/h) Reverse: 18.0 MPH) |
| Brakes | Mechanical disc | Mechanical drum |
| Cabin Type | Open operator station | Open operator station |
| Steering Type | Power | Power |
| Front Tires | Industrial: 7.50-16, 6.50-16 | Ag: 7.50-16 |
| Rear Tires | Industrial: 14.9-24, 13.6-24, 16.9-24 | Ag: 14.9-25, 13-24 |
| Hydraulic Type | Open center | Open center |
| Width | — | 167.0 cm (65.7 in.) |
| Drawbar Category | — | I |
| Total Flow | — | 30.3 LPM (8.0 GPM) |
| Steering Flow | — | 15.1 LPM (4.0 GPM) |
| Working Pressure | — | 193.1 bar (2800.0 psi) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Case 430CK Construction King Vs Case 530 CK Construction King ↗
- Massey Ferguson GC1720 Vs Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull ↗
- Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull Vs International Harvester 2444 ↗
- Case 430CK Construction King Vs John Deere 401B ↗
- Case 580B Construction King Vs Case 430CK Construction King ↗
- John Deere MI Vs Massey Ferguson 202 Work Bull ↗
- Case 430CK Construction King Vs John Deere 300B ↗
- Case 430CK Construction King Vs International Harvester 2444 ↗