Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Zetor 5320 vs International Harvester 650

A detailed comparison of the Zetor 5320 and the International Harvester 650. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Zetor 532044.7 kW (60.0 HP)
International Harvester 65042.5 kW (57.0 HP)
Weight
Zetor 53203060.0 kg (6746.1 lbs)
International Harvester 6503045.0 kg (6713.1 lbs)
SpecificationZetor 5320Zetor 5320Agricultural TractorsInternational Harvester 650International Harvester 650Agricultural Tractors
Tractor TypeUtility TractorFarm Tractor
Horsepower44.7 kW (60.0 HP)42.5 kW (57.0 HP)
Weight3060.0 kg (6746.1 lbs)3045.0 kg (6713.1 lbs)
Lift Capacity2905.0 kg (6404.4 lbs)—
Transmission TypePartially synchronizedSliding gear
Length379.0 cm (149.2 in.)342.0 cm (134.6 in.)
Years Made1995-19971956-1958
Engine ModelZetor 7201International Harvester
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselGasoline/LP-gas
Cylinders44
Displacement3595 cc (219.4 cu in.)5735 cc (350.0 cu in.)
Bore10.21 cm (4.02 in.)11.40 cm (4.49 in.)
Stroke11.00 cm (4.33 in.)14.00 cm (5.51 in.)
Rear PTO Speed540 /1000 RPM540 RPM
Rated RPM2200 RPM1500 RPM
Battery12 V—
StarterElectricElectric
Height264.0 cm (Cab Height: 103.9 in.)223.0 cm (87.8 in.)
Width183.0 cm (72.0 in.)—
Wheelbase225.0 cm (88.6 in.)—
Gears10 forward and 2 reverse5 forward and 1 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed6.0 km/h (Forward: 17.5 MPH (28.1 km/h) Reverse: 3.7 MPH)4.7 km/h (Forward: 15.7 MPH (25.3 km/h) Reverse: 2.9 MPH)
BrakesHydraulic dry discDisc
Drawbar CategoryII—
Cabin TypeCabOpen operator station
Steering TypePowerPower assist
Front TiresAg: 7.50×16Ag: 7.50-18
Rear TiresAg: 16.9×30Ag: 14-34
Total Flow40.1 LPM (10.6 GPM)—
Working Pressure180.0 bar (2610.0 psi)—
Rear PTO Type—Transmission
Compression Ratio—Gasoline: 6.12:1LP-gas: 8.25:1
Hydraulic Type—Hydra-Touch
Valves—1

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons