Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Wheel Horse D-200 vs Cub Cadet 2206

A detailed comparison of the Wheel Horse D-200 and the Cub Cadet 2206. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Wheel Horse D-20014.8 kW (19.8 HP)
Cub Cadet 220614.9 kW (20.0 HP)
SpecificationWheel Horse D-200Wheel Horse D-200Garden and Lawn TractorsCub Cadet 2206Cub Cadet 2206Garden and Lawn Tractors
Tractor Main CategoryGarden and Lawn Care TractorsGarden and Lawn Care Tractors
Tractor TypeGarden TractorGarden Tractor
Horsepower14.8 kW (19.8 HP)14.9 kW (20.0 HP)
Weight464.0 kg (1022.9 lbs)—
Transmission TypeHydrostaticShaft-driven hydrostatic
Length191.0 cm (75.2 in.)182.0 cm (71.7 in.)
Years Made1974-19812000-2002
Engine ModelKohler K532SKohler Command
Engine Type4-stroke, air-cooled4-stroke, air-cooled
Fuel TypeGasolineGasoline
Cylinders22
Displacement880 cc (53.7 cu in.)624 cc (38.1 cu in.)
Bore8.61 cm (3.39 in.)7.70 cm (3.03 in.)
Stroke7.59 cm (2.99 in.)6.71 cm (2.64 in.)
Rated RPM3600 RPM3600 RPM
Battery12 V12 V, CCA 275A
StarterElectricElectric
Height115.0 cm (45.3 in.)109.0 cm (42.9 in.)
Width114.0 cm (44.9 in.)—
Wheelbase127.0 cm (50.0 in.)119.0 cm (46.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity30.3 l (8.0 gal)7.9 l (2.1 gal)
Oil Capacity3.3 l (0.9 gal)1.9 l (0.5 gal)
Transmission Oil Capacity5.7 l (1.5 gal)5.7 l (1.5 gal)
Transmission ModelSundstrand 90—
GearsInfinite forward and reverseInfinite forward and reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD
Max. Travel Speed5.8 km/h (Forward: 7.5 MPH (12.1 km/h) Reverse: 3.6 MPH)4.8 km/h (Forward: 6.0 MPH (9.7 km/h) Reverse: 3.0 MPH)
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationOpen operator station
Steering TypeManualManual
Front TiresLawn/turf: 18×8.50-8Lawn/turf: 16×6.5-8
Rear TiresLawn/turf: 26×12.00-12Lawn/turf: 23×9.5-12
Front PTO Type—Independent with electric clutch
Ground Clearance—15.0 cm (5.9 in.)
Brakes—Internal expanding

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons