Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Wacker Neuson EZ53 vs Bobcat E63

A detailed comparison of the Wacker Neuson EZ53 and the Bobcat E63. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Wacker Neuson EZ5343 kW (58 HP)
Bobcat E6344 kW (59 HP)
Weight
Wacker Neuson EZ536431 kg (14178 lbs)
Bobcat E636250 kg (13779 lbs)
Operating Weight
Wacker Neuson EZ536431 kg (14178 lbs)
Bobcat E636250 kg (13779 lbs)
SpecificationWacker Neuson EZ53Wacker Neuson EZ53Mini ExcavatorsBobcat E63Bobcat E63Mini Excavators
Excavator TypeMini ExcavatorMini Excavator
Weight6431 kg (14178 lbs)6250 kg (13779 lbs)
Horsepower43 kW (58 HP)44 kW (59 HP)
Digging Depth351 cm (138 in.)411 cm (162 in.)
Max Digging Depth351 cm (138 in.)411 cm (162 in.)
Max Loading Height368.8 cm (145.2 in.)—
Max Reach Along Ground588.3 cm (231.6 in.)621.8 cm (244.8 in.)
Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth268.2 cm (105.6 in.)—
Overall Length551.7 cm (217.2 in.)—
Track Length6614.2 cm (2604.0 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground551.7 cm (217.2 in.)—
Ground Clearance33.5 cm (13.2 in.)—
Tail Swing Radius100.6 cm (39.6 in.)—
Overall Width201.2 cm (79.2 in.)—
Engine MakePerkins—
Engine Model404 F-22T—
Net Power43 kW (58 HP)44 kW (59 HP)
Gross Power47.2 kW (63.3 HP)47.9 kW (64.3 HP)
Rated Power2440 RPM2100 RPM
Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity155 LPM (41.6 GPM)—
Hydraulic System Capacity73.1 l (19.3 gal)—
Relief Valve Pressure230 Bar (3336 psi)—
Operating Weight6431 kg (14178 lbs)6250 kg (13779 lbs)
Max Travel Speed4.7 km (2.9 mph)4.7 km (2.9 mph)
Cab Height259.1 cm (102.0 in.)256.0 cm (100.8 in.)
Cooling systemWater Cooled—
Fuel Capacity82.9 l (21.9 gal)78.0 l (20.6 gal)
Displacement2215.5 cc (135 cu. in.)—
Shoe Size39.9 cm (15.7 in.)—
No of Cylinders4—
Max Cutting Height530.4 cm (208.8 in.)426.7 cm (168.0 in.)
Emission—Tier 4
Min Travel Speed—2.6 km (1.6 mph)
Engine Fuel—Diesel
Boom Swing(Left)—70 °
Boom Swing(Right)—50 °
Arm Digging Force—2.616 kg (5767 lbs)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons