Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Volvo EW210D vs Liebherr A904 INDUSTRIAL

A detailed comparison of the Volvo EW210D and the Liebherr A904 INDUSTRIAL. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Volvo EW210D19700 kg (43430 lbs)
Liebherr A904 INDUSTRIAL20200 kg (44533 lbs)
Operating Weight
Volvo EW210D19700 kg (43430 lbs)
Liebherr A904 INDUSTRIAL20200 kg (44533 lbs)
SpecificationVolvo EW210DVolvo EW210DWheeled ExcavatorsLiebherr A904 INDUSTRIALLiebherr A904 INDUSTRIALWheeled Excavators
Excavator TypeWheeled ExcavatorWheeled Excavator
Weight19700 kg (43430 lbs)20200 kg (44533 lbs)
Horsepower54 kW (73 HP)—
Digging Depth649 cm (256 in.)—
Max Digging Depth649 cm (256 in.)—
Max Reach Along Ground993.6 cm (391.2 in.)1002.8 cm (394.8 in.)
Max Digging Reach966.2 cm (380.4 in.)—
Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth442.0 cm (174.0 in.)—
Ground Clearance36.6 cm (14.4 in.)36.6 cm (14.4 in.)
Tail Swing Radius265.2 cm (104.4 in.)—
Overall Width3301.0 cm (1299.6 in.)—
Engine MakeVolvoLiebherr
Engine ModelD6HD924 T-E
Net Power54 kW (73 HP)—
Gross Power96 kw (129 hp)101 kw (135 hp)
Operating Weight19700 kg (43430 lbs)20200 kg (44533 lbs)
Swing Speed9.7 RPM10 RPM
Cab Height320.0 cm (126.0 in.)—
Wheelbase277.4 cm (109.2 in.)262.1 cm (103.2 in.)
Net Torque1027.7 Nm (758.0 ft-lbs)—
Swing Torque775.1 Nm (571.7 ft-lbs)—
Operating VoltageOperating Voltage 24 VOperating Voltage 24 V
Stroke12.7 cm (5.0 in)—
Bore9.9 cm (3.9 in)—
Max Dumping Height658.4 cm (259.2 in.)—
Displacement5701.1 cc (348 cu. in.)6640.0 cc (405 cu. in.)
No of Cylinders6—
Max Cutting Height938.8 cm (369.6 in.)—
Alternator3360 W55 A
Torque Power1500 RPM—
Undercarriage Width—249.9 cm (98.4 in.)
Hydraulic System Capacity—390.3 l (103.1 gal)
Aspiration—Direct injection turbocharged
Fuel Capacity—240.4 l (63.5 gal)
Hydraulic Pump Type—Pump Type Liebherr variable displacement swashplate in line double pump
Tire Size—10.00-20

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons