Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Thomas 45 vs Takeuchi TB045

A detailed comparison of the Thomas 45 and the Takeuchi TB045. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Thomas 4533 kW (44 HP)
Takeuchi TB04532 kW (43 HP)
Weight
Thomas 454460 kg (9833 lbs)
Takeuchi TB0454578 kg (10092 lbs)
Operating Weight
Thomas 454460 kg (9833 lbs)
Takeuchi TB0454578 kg (10092 lbs)
SpecificationThomas 45Thomas 45Mini ExcavatorsTakeuchi TB045Takeuchi TB045Mini Excavators
Excavator TypeMini ExcavatorMini Excavator
Weight4460 kg (9833 lbs)4578 kg (10092 lbs)
Horsepower33 kW (44 HP)32 kW (43 HP)
Digging Depth411 cm (162 in.)351 cm (138 in.)
Max Digging Depth411 cm (162 in.)351 cm (138 in.)
Max Loading Height420.6 cm (165.6 in.)381.0 cm (150.0 in.)
Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth335.3 cm (132.0 in.)271.3 cm (106.8 in.)
Overall Length570.0 cm (224.4 in.)—
Track Length2286.0 cm (900.0 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground192.0 cm (75.6 in.)—
Tail Swing Radius149.4 cm (58.8 in.)152.4 cm (60.0 in.)
Overall Width185.9 cm (73.2 in.)182.9 cm (72.0 in.)
Engine MakeIsuzu—
Engine Model4 LE1PA-03—
Net Power33 kW (44 HP)32 kW (43 HP)
Gross Power35.1 kW (47.1 HP)34.4 kW (46.1 HP)
Rated Power2300 RPM2000 RPM
Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity163 LPM (43.2 GPM)110 LPM (29.6 GPM)
Relief Valve Pressure603 Bar (8745 psi)196 Bar (2845 psi)
Operating Weight4460 kg (9833 lbs)4578 kg (10092 lbs)
Max Travel Speed4.7 km (2.9 mph)—
Swing Speed10 RPM11.3 RPM
Cab Height246.9 cm (97.2 in.)259.1 cm (102.0 in.)
Fuel Capacity64.4 l (17.0 gal)57.9 l (15.3 gal)
Displacement2179.5 cc (133 cu. in.)2589.2 cc (158 cu. in.)
Shoe Size40.1 cm (15.8 in.)38.1 cm (15.0 in.)
Max Cutting Height597.4 cm (235.2 in.)539.5 cm (212.4 in.)
Track Gauge128.0 cm (50.4 in.)—
Max Reach Along Ground—573.0 cm (225.6 in.)
Ground Clearance—338.3 cm (133.2 in.)
Ground Pressure—26.9 kPa (3.9 psi)
Number of Carrier Rollers per Side—5
No of Cylinders—3

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons