SPECS / COMPARISON
New Holland E805 vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC
A detailed comparison of the New Holland E805 and the Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Weight
New Holland E80579000 kg (174165 lbs)
Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC80299 kg (177030 lbs)
Operating Weight
New Holland E80579000 kg (174165 lbs)
Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC80299 kg (177030 lbs)
Digging Depth
New Holland E805872 cm (343 in.)
Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC722 cm (284 in.)
| Specification | New Holland E805 Large Excavators | Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC Large Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Large Excavator | Large Excavator |
| Weight | 79000 kg (174165 lbs) | 80299 kg (177030 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 345 kW (462 HP) | — |
| Digging Depth | 872 cm (343 in.) | 722 cm (284 in.) |
| Max Digging Depth | 872 cm (343 in.) | 722 cm (284 in.) |
| Max Loading Height | 890.0 cm (350.4 in.) | — |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 1386.8 cm (546.0 in.) | 1167.4 cm (459.6 in.) |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | 646.2 cm (254.4 in.) | — |
| Overall Length | 1304.5 cm (513.6 in.) | — |
| Track Length | 6096.0 cm (2400.0 in.) | — |
| Length of Track on Ground | 509.0 cm (200.4 in.) | — |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | 2.4 m2 (3.2 cu yds) | — |
| Max Bucket Capacity | 5.0 m2 (6.6 cu yds) | 5.0 m2 (6.6 cu yds) |
| Min Bucket Capacity | 2.4 m2 (3.2 cu yds) | — |
| Ground Clearance | 91.4 cm (36.0 in.) | 76.2 cm (30.0 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) | — |
| Overall Width | 411.5 cm (162.0 in.) | — |
| Engine Make | Isuzu | Liebherr |
| Engine Model | 6 WG1TC | D9508 A7 SCR |
| Net Power | 345 kW (462 HP) | 335 kw (449 hp) |
| Gross Power | 352.9 kW (473.3 HP) | — |
| Rated Power | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | 999 LPM (264.2 GPM) | — |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 720.4 l (190.3 gal) | 742 l (196 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | 343 Bar (4975 psi) | — |
| Operating Weight | 79000 kg (174165 lbs) | 80299 kg (177030 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 4.3 km (2.7 mph) | 3.5 km (2.2 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 7.6 RPM | — |
| Cab Height | 381.0 cm (150.0 in.) | 362.7 cm (142.8 in.) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged with intercooled | — |
| Cooling Capacity | 100.3 l (26.5 gal) | — |
| Fuel Capacity | 900.2 l (237.8 gal) | — |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 33.3 l (8.8 gal) | — |
| Operating Voltage | Operating Voltage 24 V | Operating Voltage 24V |
| Ground Pressure | 108.2 kPa (15.7 psi) | — |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | 3 | 2 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | 9 | 8 |
| Displacement | 15600.5 cc (952 cu. in.) | 16157.6 cc (986 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 65.0 cm (25.6 in.) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 1292.4 cm (508.8 in.) | — |
| Alternator | 90 A | 28 V /140 A |
| Track Gauge | 347.5 cm (136.8 in.) | — |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | 161.5 cm (63.6 in.) | — |
| Undercarriage Width | — | 417.6 cm (164.4 in.) |
| Emission | — | Tier 4 Final |
| Wheelbase | — | 481.6 cm (189.6 in.) |
| Cooling system | — | water-cooled |
| Max Torque | — | 2749.6 Nm (2028.0 ft-lbs) |
| Stroke | — | 15.7 cm (6.2 in) |
| Bore | — | 12.7 cm (5.0 in) |
| Max Dumping Height | — | 789.4 cm (310.8 in.) |
| Breakout force(ISO) | — | 39.998 kg (88180 lbs) |
| Torque Power | — | 1100 RPM |
| Drawbar Pull | — | 57.921 kg (127692 lbs) |
| Air cleaner | — | Dry-type |
| Urea tank | — | 181.7 l (48.0 gal) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Hitachi ZX850-3 Vs New Holland E805 ↗
- Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC Vs Hitachi ZAXIS850 ↗
- Link-Belt 800 LX Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- Komatsu PC800LC-8 Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- Kobelco SK850LC Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- Link-Belt 8000 QUANTUM Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- Hitachi ZX850-3 Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- New Holland E805 Vs Liebherr R966 LITRONIC ↗
- Cat 375 Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- Kobelco SK350DLC-10 BUILDING DEMO Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- Case CX800 Vs Liebherr R970 SME LITRONIC ↗
- New Holland E805 Vs John Deere 800C ↗

