Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Massey Ferguson 268 Xtra vs Massey Ferguson 271

A detailed comparison of the Massey Ferguson 268 Xtra and the Massey Ferguson 271. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Massey Ferguson 268 Xtra47.1 kW (63.1 HP)
Massey Ferguson 27148.5 kW (65.1 HP)
Weight
Massey Ferguson 268 Xtra2820.0 kg (6217.0 lbs)
Massey Ferguson 2712780.0 kg (6128.8 lbs)
SpecificationMassey Ferguson 268 XtraMassey Ferguson 268 XtraAgricultural TractorsMassey Ferguson 271Massey Ferguson 271Agricultural Tractors
Tractor TypeFarm TractorUtility Tractor
Horsepower47.1 kW (63.1 HP)48.5 kW (65.1 HP)
Weight2820.0 kg (6217.0 lbs)2780.0 kg (6128.8 lbs)
Lift Capacity2050.0 kg (4519.5 lbs)—
Transmission TypeSinchromeshSliding gear
Length389.0 cm (153.1 in.)—
Years Made1975-19831998-2000
Engine ModelSimpson S436Perkins 1004.4
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement3623 cc (221.1 cu in.)4200 cc (256.3 cu in.)
Bore9.5 cm (3.74 in.)10.31 cm (4.06 in.)
Stroke12.7 cm (5.0 in.)12.70 cm (5.00 in.)
PTO TypeRear, live type—
PTO Speed540 RPM—
Rated RPM2300 RPM2200 RPM
Battery12 V12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Height252.0 cm (99.2 in.)—
Wheelbase205.0 cm (80.7 in.)229.0 cm (90.2 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity60 l81.4 l (21.5 gal)
Gears12 forward and 4 reverse8 forward and 2 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD or 4×4 4WD4×2 2WD
Drawbar CategoryCategory IIII
Hitch TypeFerguson system—
Front Tires7.50-16Ag: 7.50-16
Rear Tires16.9-28Ag: 16.9-30
Working Pressure176 bar—
Pump Flow—39.0 LPM (10.3 GPM)
Engine Type—4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Rear PTO Type—Live wit two-stage clutch
Rear PTO Speed—540 RPM
Coolant Capacity—14.0 l (3.7 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—42.0 l (11.1 gal)
Max. Travel Speed—11.7 km/h (Forward: 17.6 MPH (28.3 km/h) Reverse: 7.3 MPH)
Brakes—Independent hydraulic wet disc
Cabin Type—Two-post folding ROPS
Steering Type—Power
Valves—2

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons