Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Liebherr A944BHD vs Liebherr A934CHD

A detailed comparison of the Liebherr A944BHD and the Liebherr A934CHD. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Liebherr A944BHD48200 kg (106263 lbs)
Liebherr A934CHD40869 kg (90100 lbs)
Operating Weight
Liebherr A944BHD48200 kg (106263 lbs)
Liebherr A934CHD40869 kg (90100 lbs)
SpecificationLiebherr A944BHDLiebherr A944BHDWheeled ExcavatorsLiebherr A934CHDLiebherr A934CHDWheeled Excavators
Excavator TypeWheeled ExcavatorWheeled Excavator
Weight48200 kg (106263 lbs)40869 kg (90100 lbs)
Horsepower183 kW (245 HP)—
Max Reach Along Ground542.5 cm (213.6 in.)1200.9 cm (472.8 in.)
Overall Length1335.0 cm (525.6 in.)—
Ground Clearance45.7 cm (18.0 in.)39.6 cm (15.6 in.)
Tail Swing Radius344.4 cm (135.6 in.)—
Overall Width332.2 cm (130.8 in.)—
Overall Width (Outriggers Down)536.4 cm (211.2 in.)—
Undercarriage Width332.2 cm (130.8 in.)320.0 cm (126.0 in.)
Engine MakeLiebherrLiebherr
Engine ModelD926 TI-ED 934 L
Net Power183 kW (245 HP)—
Gross Power191.1 kW (256.3 HP)152 kw (204 hp)
Rated Power2000 RPM—
Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity144 LPM (38.4 GPM)—
Hydraulic System Capacity680.2 l (179.7 gal)590.1 l (155.9 gal)
Relief Valve Pressure350 Bar (5077 psi)—
Operating Weight48200 kg (106263 lbs)40869 kg (90100 lbs)
Max Travel Speed14.0 km (8.7 mph)—
Swing Speed6.4 RPM8.2 RPM
Cab Height384.0 cm (151.2 in.)—
Wheelbase341.4 cm (134.4 in.)320.0 cm (126.0 in.)
AspirationDirect injection turbochargedTurbocharged and after-cooled
Swing Torque112.8 Nm (83.2 ft-lbs)—
Fuel Capacity705.2 l (186.3 gal)580.3 l (153.3 gal)
Operating VoltageOperating Voltage 24 VOperating Voltage 24 V
Transmission TypePlanetary Gear—
Displacement10001.0 cc (610 cu. in.)7000.6 cc (427 cu. in.)
No of Cylinders6—
Alternator80 A80 A
Hydraulic Pump TypePump Type Liebherr variable flow, swash plate double pump2 xLiebherr variable flow, swash plate pumps

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons