Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Kubota R420S vs John Deere 440C

A detailed comparison of the Kubota R420S and the John Deere 440C. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Kubota R420S3411.0 kg (7520 lbs)
John Deere 440C3300.0 kg (Gasoline: 6922.5 lbs (3140.0 kg) Diesel: 7275.2 lbs)
SpecificationKubota R420SKubota R420SBackhoe LoadersJohn Deere 440CJohn Deere 440CBackhoe Loaders
Horsepower29.5 kW (39.5 HP)—
Weight3411.0 kg (7520 lbs)3300.0 kg (Gasoline: 6922.5 lbs (3140.0 kg) Diesel: 7275.2 lbs)
TransmissionLight speed transmission—
Pump Capacity42.0 LPM (11.1 GPM)—
Engine ManufacturerKubota—
Engine ModelD1503-TRP-1John Deere
Gross Power29.5 kW (39.5 HP)—
No Of Cylinders3—
Engine TypeDiesel4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Displacement1501.1 cc (91.6 cu in)1857 cc (113.3 cu in.)
Power Measured2600 RPM—
Transmission TypeLight speed transmissionGear type with dry disc clutch
No Of Forward Gears2—
No Of Reverse Gears2—
Max Speed (Forward)20.1 km/h (12.5 mph)—
Pump TypeGear pump—
Pump Flow Capacity42.0 LPM (11.1 GPM)—
Relief Valve Pressure203.9 bar (2958 psi)—
Dig Depth274.3 cm (108 in)—
Loading Height213.4 cm (84 in)—
Dump Height213.4 cm (84 in)—
Operating Weight3411.0 kg (7520 lbs)—
Bucket Capacity0.4 m³ (0.53 cu yds)—
Bucket Width152.1 cm (59.9 in)—
Reach From Swivel365.8 cm (144 in)—
Overall Height243.8 cm (96 in)—
Overall Length487.7 cm (192 in)—
Overall Width152.4 cm (60 in)—
Turning Radius304.8 cm (120 in)—
Years Made—1958-1960
Fuel Type—Gasoline
Cylinders—2
Bore—10.79 cm (4.25 in.)
Stroke—10.21 cm (4.02 in.)
Rear PTO Speed—540 RPM
Compression Ratio—7.5:1
Battery—6 V or 12V
Starter—Electric
Wheelbase—175.0 cm (68.9 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity—39.7 l (10.5 gal)
Gears—5 forward and 1 reverse
Chassis—Crawler
Brakes—Contracting band
Drawbar Category—I
Cabin Type—Open operator station
Steering Type—Manual clutches
Front Tires—Tracks
Rear Tires—Tracks
Hydraulic Type—Open center
Valves—1

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons