Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Kubota L200 vs Case 245

A detailed comparison of the Kubota L200 and the Case 245. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Kubota L20015.7 kW (21.1 HP)
Case 24515.7 kW (21.1 HP)
SpecificationKubota L200Kubota L200Compact and Multi-Purpose TractorsCase 245Case 245Compact and Multi-Purpose Tractors
Tractor TypeCompact Utility TractorCompact Utility Tractor
Horsepower15.7 kW (21.1 HP)15.7 kW (21.1 HP)
Transmission TypeGear typeSynchromesh
Years Made1972-19731986-1990
Engine ModelKubotaMitsubishi K3D
Engine Type4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline4-stroke, liquid-cooled, inline
Fuel TypeDieselDiesel
Cylinders23
Displacement1070 cc (65.3 cu in.)978 cc (59.7 cu in.)
Bore8.79 cm (3.46 in.)7.29 cm (2.87 in.)
Stroke8.79 cm (3.46 in.)7.80 cm (3.07 in.)
Battery12 V12 V
StarterElectricElectric
Gears6 forward and 2 reverse9 forward and 3 reverse
Chassis4×2 2WD4×2 2WD or 4×4 MFWD 4WD
BrakesDifferential mechanical expanding shoeMechanical drum
Drawbar CategoryII
Cabin TypeOpen operator stationTwo-post folding ROPS
Steering TypeManualManual or power
Front TiresAg: 4.0-15Ag: 4.00-15 , 6-14
Rear TiresAg: 9.5-24Ag: 9.5-24
Weight—866.0 kg (1909.2 lbs)
Lift Capacity—680.0 kg (1499.1 lbs)
Length—283.0 cm (111.4 in.)
Rear PTO Type—Transmission or live
Rear PTO Speed—540.1150 RPM
Middle PTO Type—Live
Middle PTO Speed—2400 RPM
Rated RPM—2700 RPM
Compression Ratio—23.0:1
Height—137.0 cm (Steering Wheel Height: 2WD: 53.5 in. (136.0 cm) 4WD: 53.9 in.)
Width—117.0 cm (2WD: 43.3 in. (110.0 cm) 4WD: 46.1 in.)
Wheelbase—167.0 cm (65.7 in.)
Ground Clearance—27.0 cm (Front axle: 2WD: 13.4 in. (34.0 cm) 4WD: 10.6 in.)
Fuel Tank Capacity—20.8 l (5.5 gal)
Oil Capacity—4.2 l (1.1 gal)
Coolant Capacity—4.9 l (1.3 gal)
Hydraulic Capacity—25.0 l (6.6 gal)
Max. Travel Speed—12.6 km/h (Forward: 11.7 MPH (18.8 km/h) Reverse: 7.8 MPH)
Total Flow—17.0 LPM (4.5 GPM)
Valves—0 or 1

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons