Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu WA470-3 vs Hitachi LX290E

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu WA470-3 and the Hitachi LX290E. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu WA470-3194.0 kW (260.2 hp)
Hitachi LX290E217.1 kW (291.1 hp)
Weight
Komatsu WA470-321609.1 kg (47640 lbs)
Hitachi LX290E21600.1 kg (47620 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu WA470-321609.1 kg (47640 lbs)
Hitachi LX290E21600.1 kg (47620 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu WA470-3Komatsu WA470-3Wheel LoadersHitachi LX290EHitachi LX290EWheel Loaders
TypeWheel LoaderWheel Loader
Horsepower194.0 kW (260.2 hp)217.1 kW (291.1 hp)
Weight21609.1 kg (47640 lbs)21600.1 kg (47620 lbs)
Tipping Capacity16365.6 kg (36080 lbs)17799.0 kg (39240 lbs)
Max Speed31.5 km/h (19.6 mph)—
Engine ModelS6D125—
No Of Cylinders6—
Displacement11000.7 cc (671.3 cu in.)—
Rated Speed2200 RPM—
Gross Power194.0 kW (260.2 hp)—
Fuel Capacity400.1 l (105.7 gal)342.2 l (90.4 gal)
No of Forward Gears4—
No of Reverse Gears4—
Max Speed (Forward)31.5 km/h (19.6 mph)—
Max Speed (Reverse)32.8 km/h (20.4 mph)—
Operating Weight21609.1 kg (47640 lbs)21600.1 kg (47620 lbs)
Tipping Load16365.6 kg (36080 lbs)17799.0 kg (39240 lbs)
Bucket Capacity (Heaped)4.2 m³ (5.5 cu yds)4.0 m³ (5.2 cu yds)
Bucket Capacity (Struck)3.6 m³ (4.7 cu yds)—
Bucket Width304.8 cm (120 in)304.8 cm (120 in)
Breakout Force19595.2 kg (43200 lbs)21314.3 kg (46990 lbs)
Reach At Max Lift And Dump121.9 cm (48 in)121.9 cm (48 in)
Dump Clearance At Max Raise304.8 cm (120 in)304.8 cm (120 in)
Turning Radius701.0 cm (276 in)—
Wheelbase335.3 cm (132 in)335.3 cm (132 in)
Bucket Hinge Pin426.7 cm (168 in)—
Cab Height335.3 cm (132 in)335.3 cm (132 in)
Overall Length883.9 cm (348 in)823.0 cm (324 in)
Ground Clearance61.0 cm (24 in)61.0 cm (24 in)
Width Over Tires304.8 cm (120 in)—
Tire Size23.5-25-20PR26.5 R25
Net Power—217.1 kW (291.1 hp)
Transmission Type—Power shift

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons