Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu WA320-3 vs Hitachi LX170E

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu WA320-3 and the Hitachi LX170E. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu WA320-3121.0 kW (162.3 hp)
Hitachi LX170E123.0 kW (165 hp)
Weight
Komatsu WA320-313349.2 kg (29430 lbs)
Hitachi LX170E13498.9 kg (29760 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu WA320-313349.2 kg (29430 lbs)
Hitachi LX170E13498.9 kg (29760 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu WA320-3Komatsu WA320-3Wheel LoadersHitachi LX170EHitachi LX170EWheel Loaders
TypeWheel LoaderWheel Loader
Horsepower121.0 kW (162.3 hp)123.0 kW (165 hp)
Weight13349.2 kg (29430 lbs)13498.9 kg (29760 lbs)
Tipping Capacity11430.5 kg (25200 lbs)11498.6 kg (25350 lbs)
Max Speed34.1 km/h (21.2 mph)—
Engine ModelS6D108—
No Of Cylinders6—
Displacement7151.3 cc (436.4 cu in.)—
Rated Speed2380 RPM—
Gross Power121.0 kW (162.3 hp)—
Fuel Capacity221.1 l (58.4 gal)224.1 l (59.2 gal)
No of Forward Gears4—
No of Reverse Gears4—
Max Speed (Forward)34.1 km/h (21.2 mph)—
Max Speed (Reverse)35.1 km/h (21.8 mph)—
Operating Weight13349.2 kg (29430 lbs)13498.9 kg (29760 lbs)
Tipping Load11430.5 kg (25200 lbs)11498.6 kg (25350 lbs)
Bucket Capacity (Heaped)2.7 m³ (3.5 cu yds)2.5 m³ (3.3 cu yds)
Bucket Capacity (Struck)2.3 m³ (3 cu yds)—
Bucket Width274.3 cm (108 in)274.3 cm (108 in)
Breakout Force12519.1 kg (27600 lbs)12541.8 kg (27650 lbs)
Reach At Max Lift And Dump121.9 cm (48 in)121.9 cm (48 in)
Dump Clearance At Max Raise274.3 cm (108 in)274.3 cm (108 in)
Turning Radius609.6 cm (240 in)—
Wheelbase304.8 cm (120 in)304.8 cm (120 in)
Bucket Hinge Pin396.2 cm (156 in)—
Cab Height335.3 cm (132 in)335.3 cm (132 in)
Overall Length762.0 cm (300 in)731.5 cm (288 in)
Ground Clearance30.5 cm (12 in)30.5 cm (12 in)
Width Over Tires243.8 cm (96 in)—
Tire Size17.5-25-12PR20.5 R25
Net Power—123.0 kW (165 hp)
Transmission Type—Power shift

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons