Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu WA250PZ-6 vs Komatsu WA2703

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu WA250PZ-6 and the Komatsu WA2703. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Komatsu WA250PZ-612115.4 kg (26710 lbs)
Komatsu WA270312301.4 kg (27120 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu WA250PZ-612115.4 kg (26710 lbs)
Komatsu WA270312301.4 kg (27120 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu WA250PZ-6Komatsu WA250PZ-6Wheel LoadersKomatsu WA2703Komatsu WA2703Wheel Loaders
TypeWheel LoaderWheel Loader
Weight12115.4 kg (26710 lbs)12301.4 kg (27120 lbs)
Max Speed38.0 km/h (23.6 mph)—
Engine ModelSAA4D107E-1S6D102E1
Engine TypeWater-cooled, 4-cycle—
No Of Cylinders26
AspirationTurbocharged, after cooled—
Air CleanerDry type—
Displacement6690.9 cc (408.3 cu in.)5901.0 cc (360.1 cu in.)
Rated Speed2000 RPM—
Stroke45.5 cm (17.9 in)—
Bore7.1 cm (2.8 in)—
Fuel Capacity186.2 l (49.2 gal)185.1 l (48.9 gal)
Engine Oil Capacity23.1 l (6.1 gal)—
Cooling Capacity22.3 l (5.9 gal)—
Hydraulic System Capacity67.0 l (17.7 gal)120.4 l (31.8 gal)
Transmission TypeHydrostaticPower shift
No of Forward Gears44
No of Reverse Gears44
Service BrakeHydraulically actuated—
Max Speed (Forward)38.0 km/h (23.6 mph)—
Max Speed (Reverse)38.0 km/h (23.6 mph)—
Pump typeGear type pump—
Pump Flow110.2 LPM (29.1 GPM)314.2 LPM (83 GPM)
Relief Pressure186 MPa 190 kgf/cm 2 2.700 psi—
Raise Lift Arms5.7 sec—
Lower Lift Time3.3 sec—
Bucket Dump Time1.6 sec—
Operating Weight12115.4 kg (26710 lbs)12301.4 kg (27120 lbs)
Bucket Width243.8 cm (96 in)—
Breakout Force13380 kgf—
Wheelbase304.8 cm (120 in)304.8 cm (120 in)
Cab Height304.8 cm (120 in)335.3 cm (132 in)
Overall Length731.5 cm (288 in)—
Ground Clearance61.0 cm (24 in)—
Width Over Tires243.8 cm (96 in)243.8 cm (96 in)
Peak Torque—566.1 N-m (417.5 lbs ft)
Bucket Capacity (Heaped)—2.1 m³ (2.8 cu yds)
Bucket Capacity (Struck)—1.8 m³ (2.4 cu yds)
Bucket Hinge Pin—365.8 cm (144 in)
Tire Size—20.5 R25

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons