Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu WA150-5 vs Caterpillar 920

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu WA150-5 and the Caterpillar 920. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Weight
Komatsu WA150-57847.1 kg (17300 lbs)
Caterpillar 9208441.3 kg (18610 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu WA150-57847.1 kg (17300 lbs)
Caterpillar 9208441.3 kg (18610 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu WA150-5Komatsu WA150-5Wheel LoadersCaterpillar 920Caterpillar 920Wheel Loaders
TypeWheel LoaderWheel Loader
Weight7847.1 kg (17300 lbs)8441.3 kg (18610 lbs)
Engine ModelSAA4D102E-2-B3304
Engine TypeWater-cooled, 4-cycle—
No Of Cylinders4—
AspirationTurbocharged, and air-to-air after cooled—
Air CleanerDry-type—
Displacement3921.4 cc (239.3 cu in.)7000.6 cc (427.2 cu in.)
Rated Speed2000 RPM—
Stroke12.2 cm (4.8 in)—
Bore10.4 cm (4.1 in)—
Fuel Capacity133.2 l (35.2 gal)148.0 l (39.1 gal)
Transmission TypeHydrostatic—
No of Forward Gears44
No of Reverse Gears43
Pump typegear—
Pump Flow123.0 LPM (32.5 GPM)—
Relief Pressure210.0 bar (3045.8 psi)—
Raise Lift Arms5.8 sec6 sec
Lower Lift Time3.6 sec3 sec
Bucket Dump Time1.1 sec1.2 sec
Operating Weight7847.1 kg (17300 lbs)8441.3 kg (18610 lbs)
Bucket Width243.8 cm (96 in)243.8 cm (96 in)
Breakout Force7400 kgf3637.8 kg (8020 lbs)
Wheelbase6604.0 cm (2600 in)—
Ground Clearance42.5 cm (16.74 in)—
Horsepower—59.7 kW (80 hp)
Tipping Capacity—13390.0 kg (29520 lbs)
Max Speed—43.9 km/h (27.3 mph)
Net Power—59.7 kW (80 hp)
Hydraulic System Capacity—74.2 l (19.6 gal)
Max Speed (Forward)—43.9 km/h (27.3 mph)
Max Speed (Reverse)—23.3 km/h (14.5 mph)
Tipping Load—13390.0 kg (29520 lbs)
Bucket Capacity (Heaped)—0.9 m³ (1.2 cu yds)
Reach At Max Lift And Dump—61.0 cm (24 in)
Dump Clearance At Max Raise—274.3 cm (108 in)
Bucket Hinge Pin—_ -
Cab Height—304.8 cm (120 in)
Overall Length—579.1 cm (228 in)
Width Over Tires—_ -
Tire Size—L-2 (15.5-25 12 PR)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons