Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu W40 vs Caterpillar 908M

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu W40 and the Caterpillar 908M. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu W4053.7 kW (72 hp)
Caterpillar 908M55.2 kW (74 hp)
Weight
Komatsu W406431.9 kg (14180 lbs)
Caterpillar 908M6363.9 kg (14030 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu W406431.9 kg (14180 lbs)
Caterpillar 908M6363.9 kg (14030 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu W40Komatsu W40Wheel LoadersCaterpillar 908MCaterpillar 908MWheel Loaders
TypeWheel LoaderWheel Loader
Horsepower53.7 kW (72 hp)55.2 kW (74 hp)
Weight6431.9 kg (14180 lbs)6363.9 kg (14030 lbs)
Tipping Capacity4930.5 kg (10870 lbs)—
Max Speed34.6 km/h (21.5 mph)—
Engine Model4 D105Cat C3.3B DIT*
Displacement4326.2 cc (264 cu in.)3293.8 cc (201 cu in.)
Gross Power53.7 kW (72 hp)—
Fuel Capacity117.3 l (31 gal)78.0 l (20.6 gal)
Cooling Capacity32.2 l (8.5 gal)16.7 l (4.4 gal)
Transmission TypeTorqflow countershaft soft shift—
No of Forward Gears3—
No of Reverse Gears3—
Max Speed (Forward)34.6 km/h (21.5 mph)—
Max Speed (Reverse)34.1 km/h (21.2 mph)—
Operating Weight6431.9 kg (14180 lbs)6363.9 kg (14030 lbs)
Tipping Load4930.5 kg (10870 lbs)—
Bucket Capacity (Heaped)1.2 m³ (1.6 cu yds)—
Bucket Width243.8 cm (96 in)205.7 cm (81 in)
Breakout Force5928.4 kg (13070 lbs)—
Reach At Max Lift And Dump91.4 cm (36 in)—
Dump Clearance At Max Raise274.3 cm (108 in)—
Turning Radius487.7 cm (192 in)—
Wheelbase243.8 cm (96 in)213.4 cm (84 in)
Bucket Hinge Pin335.3 cm (132 in)—
Cab Height274.3 cm (108 in)—
Overall Length548.6 cm (216 in)—
Ground Clearance30.5 cm (12 in)33.0 cm (13 in)
Width Over Tires213.4 cm (84 in)—
Tire SizeL2 (16.9-24-10PR)405 /70 R20
Emissions—EPA Tier 4 Final/EU Stage IIIB
Net Power—55.2 kW (74 hp)
Stroke—11.9 cm (4.7 in)
Bore—9.4 cm (3.7 in)
Engine Oil Capacity—11.4 l (3 gal)
Hydraulic System Capacity—70.0 l (18.5 gal)
Hydraulic Tank—46.2 l (12.2 gal)
Articulation Angle—39 °

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons