Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu PC240LC-10 vs JCB 220X SC

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu PC240LC-10 and the JCB 220X SC. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu PC240LC-10132 kW (177 HP)
JCB 220X SC129 kW (173 HP)
Weight
Komatsu PC240LC-1025006 kg (55129 lbs)
JCB 220X SC24500 kg (54013 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu PC240LC-1025006 kg (55129 lbs)
JCB 220X SC24500 kg (54013 lbs)
SpecificationKomatsu PC240LC-10Komatsu PC240LC-10Mid-Size ExcavatorsJCB 220X SCJCB 220X SCMid-Size Excavators
Excavator TypeMid-Size ExcavatorMid-Size Excavator
Weight25006 kg (55129 lbs)24500 kg (54013 lbs)
Horsepower132 kW (177 HP)129 kW (173 HP)
Digging Depth692 cm (272 in.)—
Max Digging Depth692 cm (272 in.)—
Max Reach Along Ground978.4 cm (385.2 in.)—
Track Length4633.0 cm (1824.0 in.)—
Length of Track on Ground387.1 cm (152.4 in.)—
Ground Clearance45.7 cm (18.0 in.)48.8 cm (19.2 in.)
Tail Swing Radius295.7 cm (116.4 in.)—
Overall Width338.3 cm (133.2 in.)—
Engine MakeKomatsuJCB
Engine ModelSAA6D107E-2EcoMAX Tier 4 Final / IV
Net Power132 kW (177 HP)129 kW (173 HP)
Gross Power141 kw (189 hp)137.4 kW (184.3 HP)
Rated Power2000 RPM—
Hydraulic System Capacity132.1 l (34.9 gal)—
Operating Weight25006 kg (55129 lbs)24500 kg (54013 lbs)
Max Travel Speed5.5 km (3.4 mph)—
Swing Speed11.7 RPM—
Cab Height307.8 cm (121.2 in.)304.8 cm (120.0 in.)
Cooling Capacity36.0 l (9.5 gal)—
Fuel Capacity407.7 l (107.7 gal)—
Swing Drive Capacity7.6 l (2.0 gal)—
Engine Oil Capacity23.1 l (6.1 gal)—
Number of Carrier Rollers per Side2—
Number of Track Rollers per Side10—
Number of Shoes per Side51—
Displacement6685.9 cc (408 cu. in.)4801.4 cc (293 cu. in.)
Removal Counterweight Clearance112.8 cm (44.4 in.)—
Drawbar Pull20.570 kg (45349 lbs)—
Max Torque—690.1 Nm (509.0 ft-lbs)
Stroke—13.7 cm (5.4 in)
Bore—10.7 cm (4.2 in)
Alternator—100 A
Track Gauge—219.5 cm (86.4 in.)
Torque Power—1500 RPM
Battery—2 x 12 V

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons