SPECS / COMPARISON
Komatsu PC1100SP-6 vs Caterpillar 390F L
A detailed comparison of the Komatsu PC1100SP-6 and the Caterpillar 390F L. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Komatsu PC1100SP-6456 kW (611 HP)
Caterpillar 390F L391 kW (524 HP)
Weight
Komatsu PC1100SP-6104000 kg (229281 lbs)
Caterpillar 390F L86275 kg (190204 lbs)
Operating Weight
Komatsu PC1100SP-6104000 kg (229281 lbs)
Caterpillar 390F L86275 kg (190204 lbs)
| Specification | Komatsu PC1100SP-6 Large Excavators | Caterpillar 390F L Large Excavators |
|---|---|---|
| Excavator Type | Large Excavator | Large Excavator |
| Weight | 104000 kg (229281 lbs) | 86275 kg (190204 lbs) |
| Horsepower | 456 kW (611 HP) | 391 kW (524 HP) |
| Digging Depth | 792 cm (312 in.) | — |
| Max Digging Depth | 792 cm (312 in.) | — |
| Max Loading Height | 847.3 cm (333.6 in.) | — |
| Max Reach Along Ground | 1368.6 cm (538.8 in.) | — |
| Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth | 502.9 cm (198.0 in.) | — |
| Overall Length | 1603.2 cm (631.2 in.) | — |
| Track Length | 5974.1 cm (2352.0 in.) | 7620.0 cm (3000.0 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | 499.9 cm (196.8 in.) | 637.0 cm (250.8 in.) |
| Reference Bucket Capacity | 6.6 m2 (8.6 cu yds) | — |
| Ground Clearance | 100.6 cm (39.6 in.) | 91.4 cm (36.0 in.) |
| Tail Swing Radius | 487.7 cm (192.0 in.) | 472.4 cm (186.0 in.) |
| Overall Width | 460.2 cm (181.2 in.) | 277.4 cm (109.2 in.) |
| Engine Make | Komatsu | Caterpillar |
| Engine Model | SAA6D170 | C18 ACERT |
| Net Power | 456 kW (611 HP) | 391 kW (524 HP) |
| Gross Power | 464.0 kW (622.3 HP) | 399.2 kW (535.3 HP) |
| Rated Power | 1800 RPM | — |
| Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity | 1.586 LPM (419.6 GPM) | 1.007 LPM (266 GPM) |
| Hydraulic System Capacity | 670.0 l (177.0 gal) | 995.6 l (263.0 gal) |
| Relief Valve Pressure | 343 Bar (4979 psi) | — |
| Operating Weight | 104000 kg (229281 lbs) | 86275 kg (190204 lbs) |
| Max Travel Speed | 3.2 km (2 mph) | 4.5 km (2.8 mph) |
| Swing Speed | 5.8 RPM | 6.2 RPM |
| Cab Height | 393.2 cm (154.8 in.) | 384.0 cm (151.2 in.) |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged, aftercooled | — |
| Cooling Capacity | 139.3 l (36.8 gal) | 75.7 l (20.0 gal) |
| Fuel Capacity | 1360.1 l (359.3 gal) | 1242854.6 l (328327.6 gal) |
| Swing Drive Capacity | 21.6 l (5.7 gal) | 18.9 l (5.0 gal) |
| Engine Oil Capacity | 48.1 l (12.7 gal) | 60.6 l (16.0 gal) |
| Ground Pressure | 131.0 kPa (19.0 psi) | — |
| Number of Carrier Rollers per Side | 3 | 3 |
| Number of Track Rollers per Side | 8 | 9 |
| Number of Shoes per Side | 48 | 51 |
| Displacement | 23150.0 cc (1413 cu. in.) | 18099.5 cc (1105 cu. in.) |
| Shoe Size | 70.1 cm (27.6 in.) | — |
| Max Cutting Height | 1301.5 cm (512.4 in.) | — |
| Track Gauge | 390.1 cm (153.6 in.) | — |
| Removal Counterweight Clearance | 179.8 cm (70.8 in.) | 164.6 cm (64.8 in.) |
| Drawbar Pull | 70.001 kg (154324 lbs) | 60.164 kg (132637 lbs) |
| Stroke | — | 18.3 cm (7.2 in) |
| Bore | — | 14.5 cm (5.7 in) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.
Other comparisons
- Komatsu PC1100SP-6 Vs Komatsu PC1100LC-6 ↗
- Komatsu PC1100SP-6 Vs Cat 385C FS ↗
- Komatsu PC1100LC-6 Vs Cat 390F L ↗
- Cat 390D L Vs Cat 390F L ↗
- Komatsu PC1100SP-6 Vs Komatsu PC1100-6 ↗
- Komatsu PC1100SP-6 Vs Hitachi EX1100 ↗
- Komatsu PC1100SP-6 Vs Liebherr R980 SME LITRONIC ↗
- Hitachi ZX870LCR-3 Vs Cat 390F L ↗
- Cat 390F L Vs Cat 385B ↗
- Hitachi ZX870LC-6 Vs Cat 390F L ↗
- Komatsu H135S Vs Komatsu PC1100SP-6 ↗
- Cat 385B L Vs Cat 390F L ↗