Skip to content
HEAVYEQUIPMENTS.net
SPECS / COMPARISON

Komatsu D65PX-15 E0 vs Komatsu D65WX-15 PAT

A detailed comparison of the Komatsu D65PX-15 E0 and the Komatsu D65WX-15 PAT. Click a model name to view its full specifications.

Horsepower
Komatsu D65PX-15 E0154.4 kW (207 HP)
Komatsu D65WX-15 PAT154.4 kW (207 HP)
SpecificationKomatsu D65PX-15 E0Komatsu D65PX-15 E0Crawler DozersKomatsu D65WX-15 PATKomatsu D65WX-15 PATCrawler Dozers
TypeCrawler DozerCrawler Dozer
Horsepower154.4 kW (207 HP)154.4 kW (207 HP)
Engine ManufacturerKomatsuKomatsu
Engine ModelSAA6D114E-3SAA6D114E-3
Gross Power154.4 kW (207 HP)154.4 kW (207 HP)
Net Power152.9 kW (205 HP)152.9 kW (205 HP)
AspirationTurbochargedTurbocharged with aftercooled
Number of Cylinders66
Displacement8275.5 cc (505 cu in.)8275.5 cc (505 cu in.)
Power Measured RPM1950 RPM—
Number of Forward Gears33
Number of Reverse Gears33
Max Speed Forward10.1 km/h (6.3 mph)10.1 km/h (6.3 mph)
Max Speed Reverse13.0 km/h (8.1 mph)13.0 km/h (8.1 mph)
Ground Pressure0.3 bar (4.3 psi)0.5 bar (7.1 psi)
Fuel Capacity415.3 l (109.7 gal)414.9 l (109.6 gal)
Engine Oil Capacity28.0 l (7.4 gal)28.0 l (7.4 gal)
Cooling System Capacity37.1 l (9.8 gal)37.1 l (9.8 gal)
Final Drives Capacity27.3 l (7.2 gal)26.9 l (7.1 gal)
Relief Valve Pressure206.2 bar (2990 psi)206.2 bar (2990 psi)
Cab Height323.1 cm (127.2 in.)323.1 cm (127.2 in.)
Length of Track on Ground554.7 cm (218.4 in.)298.7 cm (117.6 in.)
Track Gauge207.3 cm (81.6 in.)207.3 cm (81.6 in.)
Ground Clearance42.7 cm (16.8 in.)42.7 cm (16.8 in.)
Ground Contact Area152695.0 cm³ (9318 cu in.)99912.1 cm³ (6097 cu in.)
No of Shoes Per Side4542
No of Track Rollers Per Side88
Shoe Size91.7 cm (36.1 in.)—
Operating Weight—21459.4 kg (47310 lbs)
Pump Flow—210.1 LPM (55.5 GPM)
Transmission Type—Multi-disc clutch transmission
Hydraulic Pump Flow—210.1 LPM (55.5 GPM)
Length Overall—560.8 cm (220.8 in.)
Weight (Operating)—21459.4 kg (47310 lbs)

Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.

Other comparisons