SPECS / COMPARISON
Komatsu D60P-8 vs Komatsu D65E-7
A detailed comparison of the Komatsu D60P-8 and the Komatsu D65E-7. Click a model name to view its full specifications.
Horsepower
Komatsu D60P-8123.0 kW (165 HP)
Komatsu D65E-7123.0 kW (165 HP)
Operating Weight
Komatsu D60P-817550.0 kg (38691.2 lbs)
Komatsu D65E-713690.0 kg (30181.3 lbs)
| Specification | Komatsu D60P-8 Crawler Dozers | Komatsu D65E-7Crawler Dozers |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Crawler Dozer | Crawler Dozer |
| Horsepower | 123.0 kW (165 HP) | 123.0 kW (165 HP) |
| Operating Weight | 17550.0 kg (38691.2 lbs) | 13690.0 kg (30181.3 lbs) |
| Engine Manufacturer | Komatsu | Komatsu |
| Engine Model | 6 D125-1 | NH220-CI |
| Gross Power | 123.0 kW (165 HP) | 123.0 kW (165 HP) |
| Number of Cylinders | 6 | — |
| Displacement | 11041.6 cc (673.8 cu in.) | 12175.6 cc (743 cu in.) |
| Power Measured RPM | 1850 RPM | — |
| Transmission Type | Direct Drive | Planetary Gear |
| Number of Forward Gears | 5 | 3 |
| Number of Reverse Gears | 4 | 3 |
| Cab Height | 307.8 cm (121.2 in.) | 301.8 cm (118.8 in.) |
| Width Over Track | 301.8 cm (118.8 in.) | 240.8 cm (94.8 in.) |
| Length Overall | 560.8 cm (220.8 in.) | — |
| Length without Blade | 432.8 cm (170.4 in.) | 536.4 cm (211.2 in.) |
| Length of Track on Ground | 317.0 cm (124.8 in.) | 265.2 cm (104.4 in.) |
| Track Gauge | 207.3 cm (81.6 in.) | 189.0 cm (74.4 in.) |
| Ground Clearance | 51.8 cm (20.4 in.) | — |
| No of Carrier Rollers Per Side | 2 | — |
| No of Shoes Per Side | 44 | — |
| No of Track Rollers Per Side | 7 | 7 |
| Shoe Size | 95.3 cm (37.5 in.) | 51.1 cm (20.1 in.) |
| Weight (Operating) | 17550.0 kg (38691.2 lbs) | 13690.0 kg (30181.3 lbs) |
| Track Pitch | 20.3 cm (8 in.) | — |
| Max Speed Forward | — | 10.9 km/h (6.8 mph) |
| Max Speed Reverse | — | 13.8 km/h (8.6 mph) |
| Ground Pressure | — | 0.5 bar (7.4 psi) |
| Fuel Capacity | — | 320.2 l (84.6 gal) |
| Cooling System Capacity | — | 63.2 l (16.7 gal) |
Values come from the manufacturer-sourced model files; empty cells mean the property is not published for that model. No performance ranking is applied.